RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @THEChrisKorvela: @GioRazini @TheKirkHeuser @Frazzling @boehmerB @MarieFrRenaud Read the actual scientific study then: https://t.co/AFsl…
@GioRazini @TheKirkHeuser @Frazzling @boehmerB @MarieFrRenaud Read the actual scientific study then: https://t.co/AFsl37wnK0
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @primroseriordan: Methodological flaws, mistakes found in scientific papers which reject global warming https://t.co/we40wO1oai
RT @primroseriordan: Methodological flaws, mistakes found in scientific papers which reject global warming https://t.co/we40wO1oai
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
Methodological flaws, mistakes found in scientific papers which reject global warming https://t.co/we40wO1oai
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
So for those keeping track: 97% proof global warming by humans. Other 3% is faked/cherry picked. Even the petro co's agree it's us. https://t.co/TVc4kQQz6t
@katherineefoley Article Link: https://t.co/wd2sM31yU8. Thank you @RasmusBenestad @dana1981 @STWorg @KHayhoe @hohygen Rob van Dorland @johnfocook #consensus
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
Cool article on @qz about #climatechange , the academic paper that underpins the conclusions is here, for free https://t.co/Ll1IfbK4Xt https://t.co/j14nphQwIz
Learning from mistakes in climate research https://t.co/V0ICmnuYDM
"Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed" https://t.co/xA8eUJoA90
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
The 3% denier papers: inappropriate statistical methods, or basing conclusions on misconceived or incomplete physics https://t.co/nhHpFSakI1
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @JosephMajkut: Want to read scientific ground-and-pound? The 3% of published studies that dispute #AGW are demonstrably wrong. https://…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
Μην το πείτε στον Ανδριανόπουλο... https://t.co/ZlbAmVkd6m
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Esxi8D https://t.co/TUYO4GVe7M
RT @JosephMajkut: Want to read scientific ground-and-pound? The 3% of published studies that dispute #AGW are demonstrably wrong. https://…
Want to read scientific ground-and-pound? The 3% of published studies that dispute #AGW are demonstrably wrong. https://t.co/d5HLvBZZaE
Researchers find 38 influential #climatechange denial papers are all methodologically flawed. Science works! https://t.co/hW2wtcPnN7
Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed https://t.co/cGOL5C75AD
I'm reading this on #springerlink https://t.co/i72xxErL10
@shirtrade @AshGhebranious @ProfRayWills @arikring @dhlovelife @bueti @PaulHBeckwith @SolarPowerEU @CLAUDIABAHAMON @luribea68 @Sustainablehero @RBJRON @suzlette333 The 97% is firmly established. What is more, the other 3% mostly have been proeven false or
@anonymous17gk @cezaraguilar22 @ramsesmanzo03 @Xciioo @GGReisman That refuses it just so you can emit as many pollutants as you want. Theres so many flaws in those articles https://t.co/4nX8A3bgYp
@denkdusben @Leolucassen @BVerheggen @marijn_poels Plus, artikelen die AGW conclusie niet accepteren hebben vaak methodologische problemen, zie bijv https://t.co/GQpPgdvf8P -BV
RT @jankunnas: Learning from mistakes in #climate research https://t.co/DH3uXLJtHl
Learning from mistakes in #climate research https://t.co/DH3uXLJtHl
@CaseyParksIt @jimdiverman As if I didn't know that. Unfortunately some of those theories are deeply flawed. https://t.co/ioBRNcnbIM
Learning from mistakes in #climate research - what's wrong with the 2% papers that reject human-made #globalwarming? https://t.co/XZI7U6MHmJ
I'm reading "Learning from mistakes in climate research" on #springerlink https://t.co/xFLENgthRV *FREE ACCESS*
@UghSoMuchSilly @VisenyasRevenge @AHamiltonSpirit Sorry but papers whose results are not replicable do not " make more sense". https://t.co/fUDdsCmf4W https://t.co/RIyrui6vMz
@UghSoMuchSilly @VisenyasRevenge @AHamiltonSpirit By the way,your greats'work is not robust or replicable. In other words, it's garbage like your thinking & logic: https://t.co/fUDdsCmf4W
@RogTallbloke @WMO @AMAP_Arctic There are many myths surrounding such so-called cycles - see https://t.co/NOcTuVoow5 for further discussion. Look for physical causes. https://t.co/Z2FpZqnxAQ
RT @KHayhoe: @jason_loxton we replicated 38 climate studies that disagreed w consensus and found errors in all. https://t.co/N27q4MWjy4
RT @KHayhoe: @henrifdrake @sciencemagazine absolutely; I was speaking from the experience of trying to get this published https://t.co/N27…
@henrifdrake @sciencemagazine absolutely; I was speaking from the experience of trying to get this published https://t.co/N27q4MWjy4
@jason_loxton we replicated 38 climate studies that disagreed w consensus and found errors in all. https://t.co/N27q4MWjy4
RT @SilverVVulpes: Climate change skepticism as another victim of the replication crisis https://t.co/kiQ3weJYPY Paper: https://t.co/DQp8a…
RT @SilverVVulpes: Climate change skepticism as another victim of the replication crisis https://t.co/kiQ3weJYPY Paper: https://t.co/DQp8a…
RT @SilverVVulpes: Climate change skepticism as another victim of the replication crisis https://t.co/kiQ3weJYPY Paper: https://t.co/DQp8a…
Climate change skepticism as another victim of the replication crisis https://t.co/kiQ3weJYPY Paper: https://t.co/DQp8amWS66
RT @AndreuEscriva: Aquí el artículo original de, entre otros, @dana1981 (enorme periodista), @KHayhoe y John Cook (@skepticscience). https:…
Aquí el artículo original de, entre otros, @dana1981 (enorme periodista), @KHayhoe y John Cook (@skepticscience). https://t.co/rLomnb9EmC
@Steffennerdal @Nina_Jensen @KRmgr1 vitenskaplige resultater skal etterprøves & gjenskapes andre uavhengige kolleger https://t.co/7m5WAJPfHi
@KRmgr1 @unnieik @NRKViten feil. Jeg har gjennomgått sentrale artikler som det henvises til & funnet grove feil. https://t.co/7m5WAJPfHi
@GoodsJL @tan123 It is debunked in the supporting material in https://t.co/7m5WAJPfHi