RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
The 2% of papers that deny global warming are flawed, study concludes. https://t.co/OsBsvAjxHx #climatechange #globalwarming
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
Anthropogenic global warming is real. This is serious. https://t.co/w37ZAQYvCo
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
@TogaUnites interesting https://t.co/zysQ4S1s1h
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
Boom roasted?? #sustainability https://t.co/4eR8Gb7HGB
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
@Gardenman8 @KrakFollowsGovt @HappierAccident @get2thegulch @HalfBadHombre @PrisonPlanet Here's a study explaining the fundamental flaws in many papers which have sought to challenge AGW: https://t.co/Jbbrb0xr6s
RT @JLVernonPhD: So you've found the 2% of faulty dissenters. That's not how #science works: https://t.co/ccPoGGYbbq https://t.co/Pu5qwJSsR5
RT @JLVernonPhD: So you've found the 2% of faulty dissenters. That's not how #science works: https://t.co/ccPoGGYbbq https://t.co/Pu5qwJSsR5
So you've found the 2% of faulty dissenters. That's not how #science works: https://t.co/ccPoGGYbbq https://t.co/Pu5qwJSsR5
@EcoSenseNow after this was published nonetheless. https://t.co/yg7UMWMtgE
@WrongTimeline And as our study showed, that trust (as I'd call it, rather than faith) is sometimes misplaced. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
@VictorLapuente @joanpla Y más sobre negacionistas y sus "estudios". Erróneos, o falsos, en buena medida. Por eso, en Ciencia no se "cree" https://t.co/TcPZSvmvaO
And before I hear the whole, that is just mainstream media hiding the truth here it is in a scientific journal https://t.co/90QccvKsBj
RT @SynneSidenius: Kjenner du noen som tror at det finnes andre grunner til klimaendringene enn de menneskeskapte? Da anbefales denne: http…
RT @flitedocnm: Theoretical & Applied Climatology: Attempts to replicate the 2% of papers that reject #AGW➡️ a pattern of mistakes. https:/…
Theoretical & Applied Climatology: Attempts to replicate the 2% of papers that reject #AGW➡️ a pattern of mistakes. https://t.co/7Y87HJSEMB https://t.co/E5FDeBJbJ5
Learning from mistakes in climate research https://t.co/fC23mGyKa4 https://t.co/fuhRZSYjPU
Kjenner du noen som tror at det finnes andre grunner til klimaendringene enn de menneskeskapte? Da anbefales denne: https://t.co/KLRKwHb1ay
RT @NiHaBo: 🌍Bugged by a practitioner of #ClimateChangeDenial? Slip them this and watch the implosion- https://t.co/D2LEHDTyXU #climatecha…
🌍Bugged by a practitioner of #ClimateChangeDenial? Slip them this and watch the implosion- https://t.co/D2LEHDTyXU #climatechange #Climate
climate change is a hoax, fake news! less than 5% of published facts "climate researchers" have posted are... https://t.co/2PQkcU4CV9
Flaws in a # of articles skeptical of AGW. https://t.co/c4ZtYjDozP
Link to primary source. Learning from mistakes in climate research | SpringerLink https://t.co/J9qaKBsQlq
Interesting read on climate change studies https://t.co/fmt9AU0Yeo
Here’s what happens when you try to replicate climate contrarian papers: https://t.co/H9ugm2XzNB Original study: https://t.co/QA6rsN4cna 👍
RT @BigChiliVerde: A brilliant paper analyzing and quashing the climate change deniers and their arguments. #ClimateChange #SuckIt... https…
A brilliant paper analyzing and quashing the climate change deniers and their arguments. #ClimateChange #SuckIt... https://t.co/BxTqzKSSeq
Nice replication study debunking a set of climate-change skeptic papers: Learning from mistakes in climate research https://t.co/Q1baKZoUFf
@Wikisteff @docfreeride This one? https://t.co/zIq3peVp49
@Pirulla25 https://t.co/cEyoFTFQvU pfvr, faz um vídeo sobre isso, nunca te pedi nada :)
Prooving climate sceptics wrong, by disprooving their analyses. I LIKE!! https://t.co/Ernd0E6ePR
Die Originalstudie, auf die ze.tt verweist: https://t.co/v9dDctEn2R https://t.co/0xB9izwHwW
@BTFurtado @scicastpodcast E o artigo me questão!!! https://t.co/t0K38cmiy5
@Ruf_MEN @MisandryToday Science is never settled, that's why you keep testing the null hypothesis and trying to falsify claims. https://t.co/63u3lxqhN1
Regardless of what you know about climate change, read this and you'll at least find out about "agnotology". https://t.co/OWnlCgAX1s
@lozzacash @SenatorMRoberts oh dear, even less scientific support for climate change denial https://t.co/HfaN1oZ9qd
@qz For those nerds like me out there: here's the full research paper: #climatechange https://t.co/QAA9Unw2zC
missing context, ignoring information, insufficient model evaluation, false dichotomies, inappropriate methods, ... https://t.co/RfkBKrVUTO
RT @seanmhoban: Q: Why do 2% of scientists reject #climatechange evidence? A: "inappropriate statistics... or incomplete physics" https://t…
A ESCOLHA É SUA Se alguém me perguntasse qual é a maior invenção da história da humanidade, eu diria que é o... https://t.co/ZWIbSFETgW
Voilà un article chaud (dans ta région) sur un sujet brûlant https://t.co/YMimetkvgB, ET en Open Access
...e il 2% di articoli scientifici negazionisti climatuci ha errori che, se corretti, li fanno crollare. Ops! https://t.co/XYtqVEKCPn
RT @seanmhoban: Q: Why do 2% of scientists reject #climatechange evidence? A: "inappropriate statistics... or incomplete physics" https://t…
Q: Why do 2% of scientists reject #climatechange evidence? A: "inappropriate statistics... or incomplete physics" https://t.co/wCflA3mXwX
Peer-reviewed study about the infamous 2% of climate papers that reject anthropogenic (man-made) global warming https://t.co/GHb5FYmuUr
3% of published literature rejects anthropogenic global warming. All 3% were found to be flawed. https://t.co/KSOJLTHoul
I'm reading this on #springerlink https://t.co/4kB3M9zfy5
Scientific analyses of some of the 3% deniers, v.illuminating and useful! https://t.co/GNunI5lwDM
Interesting! Recent paper shows 97% consensus on #climate #science Authors find 'common mistakes' in the other 3% https://t.co/1iB1ZATMtm
An interesting paper about climate change denial https://t.co/kxTmAueLNX Look also https://t.co/AwisQCajGm
Turns out that the 3% of scientific studies that don't support climate change being real are flawed methodologically https://t.co/GJPE3Fk3Uv
RT @DJSnM: We often hear that 97% of science papers support anthropogenic global warming. A team analyzed the other 3%. https://t.co/JAm6Es…
There 97 % consensus in the relevant peer-reviewed #climate science literature on humans causing global warming. https://t.co/Cx8KBiZifO
Alguien que le explique que https://t.co/wwrlM8x7lN no son las revistas bobas que este pobre cree que se leen como ciencia. https://t.co/MLWB0UBwkZ
"weaknesses inc. false dichotomies,inappropriate stat. methods or basing concl. on misconceived/incomplete physics" https://t.co/ELhOtKq7af
PaperOfTheDay "Learning from mistakes in climate research" https://t.co/sBEGKnGHjQ
Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed. https://t.co/xq7xy7K4aC