RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% Of Scientific Papers That Deny Climate Change: 🌎A review found them all flawed 🌍Researchers tried to replicate…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% Of Scientific Papers That Deny Climate Change: 🌎A review found them all flawed 🌍Researchers tried to replicate…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% Of Scientific Papers That Deny Climate Change: 🌎A review found them all flawed 🌍Researchers tried to replicate…
RT @pall336: @taiwa_kankyo 江守室長が認識される科学者とはどういう人たちを指すのでしょうか? IPCCに関与している地球温暖化を唱える人、またそれに対する懐疑論を唱える人は学者であっても科学者ではないのでは。科学的立証がなされていない事を前提に協議する…
RT @KHayhoe: @BrianofNJ Ha! Did you see this one? https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
@BrianofNJ Ha! Did you see this one? https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
This also explains the significance of consensus. A consensus is a RESULT of lots of investigation and checking of many ideas. Consensus occurs when alternatives are given a fair go and fail to work. https://t.co/aqCojKnwCL
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @KHayhoe: @WAPolicyGreen @ClimateHawk2 @mtobis @travitt Todd, we took the critiques so seriously that we re-calculated 38 of them from s…
RT @KHayhoe: @WAPolicyGreen @ClimateHawk2 @mtobis @travitt Todd, we took the critiques so seriously that we re-calculated 38 of them from s…
RT @KHayhoe: @WAPolicyGreen @ClimateHawk2 @mtobis @travitt Todd, we took the critiques so seriously that we re-calculated 38 of them from s…
@WAPolicyGreen @ClimateHawk2 @mtobis @travitt Todd, we took the critiques so seriously that we re-calculated 38 of them from scratch: and found an error in every single one that, if corrected, brought their results in line with the scientific consensus.
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
RT @RasmusBenestad: Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final p…
Our paper is the 3rd most downloaded from https://t.co/lGgSX2FPMm and after the journal didn't think it merited final publication taking reviews into account, we got it published in TAC https://t.co/i72xxErL10 where it has been downloaded 71K times. @hohyg
RT @pall336: @taiwa_kankyo 江守室長が認識される科学者とはどういう人たちを指すのでしょうか? IPCCに関与している地球温暖化を唱える人、またそれに対する懐疑論を唱える人は学者であっても科学者ではないのでは。科学的立証がなされていない事を前提に協議する…
@taiwa_kankyo 江守室長が認識される科学者とはどういう人たちを指すのでしょうか? IPCCに関与している地球温暖化を唱える人、またそれに対する懐疑論を唱える人は学者であっても科学者ではないのでは。科学的立証がなされていない事を前提に協議すること、それに反論することが無意味では? https://t.co/ZNK9cvgKUQ
@pall336 江守室長のコメントです🐱ぺあ 「科学者の多さでいうと、査読を経て出版された科学論文の97%が人為起源温暖化を支持しているという調査があります。 https://t.co/MPrJMK6vuT また、人為起源温暖化を否定する論文を再検証したらすべて間違っていたという論文が出ました。 https://t.co/6kLuA98UYF
@GeoffreySaucer @SnausageOfDoom @jackhumphrey @JoshuaTreeNPS Read the evidence-based #SCIENCE, Geoffrey. 97% of papers agree w/ anthropogenic climate change. The others are flawed. Don’t be so fickle https://t.co/RYqih39G5U
RT @eric_herring: .@ClimateReality We often hear that 97% of climate science agrees that climate change is mainly caused by humans. This is…
.@algore We often hear that 97% of climate science agrees that climate change is mainly caused by humans. This is true: see https://t.co/UPMfbvc1DV …. The crucial other thing we don't hear is that all of the science that disagrees is flawed: see https://t.
RT @eric_herring: .@ClimateReality We often hear that 97% of climate science agrees that climate change is mainly caused by humans. This is…
.@ClimateReality We often hear that 97% of climate science agrees that climate change is mainly caused by humans. This is true: see https://t.co/UPMfbvc1DV. The crucial other thing we don't hear is that all of the science that disagrees is flawed: see http
@Notley_Crue @joshieBex @Petrunak3D @OilGasCanada Oh swell! You're looking for scholarly articles. Then certainly you will fine this quite interesting: https://t.co/HS7fkkRWtp. Or... Did you have a blog post you'd like to share instead?
Learning from mistakes in climate research https://t.co/I3mwAUoeM0
Link to the fascinating original article. Been meaning to read more about climate science, I think the references in the intro would be an interesting place to start https://t.co/B1L33Ayzgx
RT @dsteiny: This shows that there are NO scientific papers that dispute that global warming is happening. https://t.co/xEFAZejWWt
@MichaelPP @upfitwriter @acoyne Here is your proof. https://t.co/ggPBba38Pf #readthescience
@dphaw I can show you this. https://t.co/lds3HzdPDI
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
This this and more this👇👇👇 https://t.co/6yCbhHwqcJ
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
1. Science is never determined by consensus 2. The consensus was/is yet another fraud. DO NOT INGEST CACA FOOL-AID https://t.co/JvFJsGWckl
Global warming should be considered seriously https://t.co/NHlbE7HyeR
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @LaurelCoons: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange https:…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
Learning from mistakes in climate research | SpringerLink https://t.co/sOOQDSqtZu
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
@jgonzalezmdjd And you might have missed this one: https://t.co/NRQOyBAvlD
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…
RT @laurelaubrie1: Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed! 🌏🌎🌏 #climate #climatechange http…