RT @edgeben: Benbrook puts out a paper comparing the EPA analysis of #glyphosate to the IARC analysis. Uses some dodgy definitions as to wh…
Here is the @ewg's press release putting its spin on the Benbrook paper. Kind of typical of their data distortion trade. https://t.co/fF1Ophq2EG
Benbrook puts out a paper comparing the EPA analysis of #glyphosate to the IARC analysis. Uses some dodgy definitions as to what constitutes positive results. https://t.co/fF6NUlQTNv
Neue Studie erklärt die kontroverse Diskussion zur #Genotoxizität von #Glyphosat basierten Herbiziden. Artikel wurde von 10 Gutachtern geprüft. https://t.co/KbWNsbINvx
New study disentangles controversy around #genotoxicity of #glyphosate based herbicides. Paper was evaluated by 10 reviewers. https://t.co/KbWNsbINvx
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/lTpD9BuJyJ Thoughts?
RT @SpringerEcology: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides…
RT @garyruskin: How did the US @EPA and @IARCWHO reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based herbicide…
RT @vixenvalentino: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?…
In a commentary the editors of ESU wrote, “We are convinced that the article provides new insights on why different conclusions regarding the carcinogenicity of glyphosate were reached by the US EPA and IARC." TEN REVIEWERS https://t.co/cWzBupfNHg
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @T_Fiolet: 🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IA…
WHO's Int'l Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. The US EPA concluded otherwise. Benbrook explains: EPA relied mostly on unpublished industry studies while IARC mostly on peer-reviewed scientific studies.
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @AnthonyGuihur: @julienbayou @podeus69 vous parlez de ça ? https://t.co/HXcku2JMbc On parle de Charles Benbrook, militant anti-OGM, fina…
RT @Matadon_: Dans ce 2e article, il est question d'une étude publiée récemment dans Environmental Sciences Europe qui compare les évaluati…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
This seems like it could be useful for helping clear things up, at least around why US EPA and IARC came to different conclusions about the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. Open access. https://t.co/WoNzc0e779 https://t.co/DumlK3VcNq
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?https://t.co/33sGQFZaUn
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
Why @EPA & @IARCWHO reached opposing conclusions re #carcinogenicity of #glyphosate: EPA relied on industry commissioned, unpublished studies, 99% of which were negative, while UN Cancer Agency relied on peer-reviewed studies of which 70% were positive
RT @Matadon_: Dans ce 2e article, il est question d'une étude publiée récemment dans Environmental Sciences Europe qui compare les évaluati…
RT @Matadon_: Dans ce 2e article, il est question d'une étude publiée récemment dans Environmental Sciences Europe qui compare les évaluati…
RT @Matadon_: Dans ce 2e article, il est question d'une étude publiée récemment dans Environmental Sciences Europe qui compare les évaluati…
Dans ce 2e article, il est question d'une étude publiée récemment dans Environmental Sciences Europe qui compare les évaluations de l'EPA et du CIRC : https://t.co/eD6u31eUp8 On en est encore à comparer une agence d'évaluations des risques à une agence qui
@julienbayou @podeus69 vous parlez de ça ? https://t.co/HXcku2JMbc On parle de Charles Benbrook, militant anti-OGM, financé il y a peu par les lobby pro-bio aux US. En outre, ils parlent QUE de l'US EPA, pas des avis des autres instituts à travers le monde
RT @T_Fiolet: 🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IA…
RT @T_Fiolet: 🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IA…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
Quelle est l'ampleur des biais de sélection et de publication des deux cotés?
RT @T_Fiolet: 🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IA…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based herbicides? By https://t.co/XrzRx9gUpp
RT @T_Fiolet: 🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IA…
🔥Nouvelle étude très intéressante sur la génotoxicité du #GLYPHOSATE comparant les méthodes d'évaluation des risques de l'#IARC et l'#USEPA Seules 2% des études industrielles ont rapporté un résultat positif! https://t.co/ADlJv1c9DB #monsanto #roundup #p
Why @EPA & @IARCWHO reached opposing conclusions re #carcinogenicity of #glyphosate: EPA relied on industry commissioned, unpublished studies, 99% of which were negative, while UN Cancer Agency relied on peer-reviewed studies of which 70% were positive
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
@EFSA_EU ... Il semble y avoir un gros souvi avec les procédures d'évaluation sanitaire. @Matadon_ , une petite critique de l'étude ? https://t.co/N5nOAxrsoX
These are fact based arguments!
RT @ThoBaSwe: Just to continue the #glyphosate discussion: here's @chuckbenbrook 's new paper on why @EPA and @IARCWHO reached different co…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
Just to continue the #glyphosate discussion: here's @chuckbenbrook 's new paper on why @EPA and @IARCWHO reached different conclusions on its carcinogenicity (or lack thereof). #openaccess https://t.co/Y8GnMxYdgZ https://t.co/y6CKyH1fZy
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/lLduNtX29L
RT @vixenvalentino: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/y6aazq4jnF
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
New study: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? Hint: @EPA ignored a whole lot of data https://t.co/AQ1yO6IDl5
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
In Environmental Sciences Europe today: The EPA's decision regarding the carcinogenic potential of #glyphosate was based primarily on unpublished, industry-commissioned studies; meanwhile, the IARC used published work and made the opposite conclusion. http
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
Key insights to be had at @HygeiaAnalytics re understanding why #EPA missed so much of the boat in its assessment of #Roundup and #glyphosate genotox and #CanceRisk, and why IARC judgements reflect latest science more fully. Thanks to #enveurope for publis
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
Just out today - a comprehensive analysis of the data that EPA ignored when telling the public that glyphosate herbicide won't cause cancer. https://t.co/0HUzb546hV @JBSass @NRDCFood
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renown…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
Environmental Sciences Europe journal says this analysis out today https://t.co/WEsZnVXg6w was peer reviewed by 10 "renowned experts in genotoxicity" Editor's note here: https://t.co/QBNYpevEvS
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @SpringerEcology: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides…
RT @garyruskin: "IARC’s evaluation [of glyphosate] relied heavily on studies capable of shedding light on the distribution of real-world ex…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @GMWatch: EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies…
EPA relied on unpublished industry studies, 99% of which found #glyphosate not genotoxic, but IARC relied on published studies, 74% of which found glyphosate genotoxic. EPA's "no genotoxicity risk" judgement on glyphosate was essential to its "no carcinoge
RT @SpringerEcology: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides…
RT @SpringerEcology: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides…
“IARC’s evaluation relied heavily on studies capable of shedding light on the distribution of real-world exposures and genotoxicity risk in exposed human populations, while EPA’s evaluation placed little or no weight on such evidence.” https://t.co/M7It83s
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @careygillam: This new analysis out today says @EPA has disregarded substantial scientific evidence of genotoxicity with glyphosate-base…
RT @garyruskin: How did the US @EPA and @IARCWHO reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based herbicide…