@PierTavernier @AlainPannetier @dingologue D'autre part vous citez une agence, voici un exemple de la manière avec laquelle elles fondent leur decision (EPA): https://t.co/WJ97rwMbdd
RT @AlainPannetier: 3/ Etudes montrant la génotoxicité (dommages sur l'ADN), clastognicité (atteintes aux chromosomes) du glyphosate. La g…
RT @AlainPannetier: 3/ Etudes montrant la génotoxicité (dommages sur l'ADN), clastognicité (atteintes aux chromosomes) du glyphosate. La g…
RT @AlainPannetier: 3/ Etudes montrant la génotoxicité (dommages sur l'ADN), clastognicité (atteintes aux chromosomes) du glyphosate. La g…
RT @AlainPannetier: 3/ Etudes montrant la génotoxicité (dommages sur l'ADN), clastognicité (atteintes aux chromosomes) du glyphosate. La g…
RT @AlainPannetier: 3/ Etudes montrant la génotoxicité (dommages sur l'ADN), clastognicité (atteintes aux chromosomes) du glyphosate. La g…
RT @AlainPannetier: Benbrook 2019 USA 10.1186/s12302-018-0184-7 Explique que l'autorisation du glyphosate par l'EPA repose en partie sur un…
RT @ZoltanChivay92: @AlainPannetier A toutes fins utiles je vous pose cet article que j'avais trouvé intéressant pour mettre en perspective…
@AlainPannetier A toutes fins utiles je vous pose cet article que j'avais trouvé intéressant pour mettre en perspective les bases decisionnelles des agences https://t.co/WJ97rwMbdd
RT @Bruno_J_Navarro: Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
RT @Bruno_J_Navarro: Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
RT @Bruno_J_Navarro: Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
RT @Bruno_J_Navarro: Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
RT @Bruno_J_Navarro: Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? #glyphosate https://t.co/p4AvO6azv4
@Spider_Je @ContactPrimum @MrSam144 @Bunker_D_ @Matadon_ @jordaniiix Ok. Quelles publications scientifiques pour appuyer cela ? Parce que moi j'ai ça qui va pas trop dans votre sens : https://t.co/WgVpPKeB5X https://t.co/vVPzhV5HeZ https://t.co/t2YxJDM9nw
@ethalises @Matadon_ Vous avez raison de le faire remarquer. En effet, il faut être prudent avec cette étude. Mais ce n'est pas pour autant qu'il faut la rejeter automatiquement. Regardez ce que fait @Matadon_ sur l'étude d'un anti-glyphosate: Il critique
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/C6JRMKtxQW
How did EPA conclude glyphosate-based herbicides (Roundup) are safe? 1) EPA relied on "registrant-commissioned, unpublished" studies 2) EPA assumed only exposure was via food consumption not occupational (agricultural; landscaping) or home lawn care http
...mientras que la evaluación de la EPA atribuyó poca o ninguna importancia a tales pruebas." ....... Juzguen ustedes, les dejo el link del ARTICULO CIENTIFICO https://t.co/zpdhQOSnuu
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? @careygillam @USRightToKnow https://t.co/U8Rc7BrzNY
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
@asenar @L1nsoumise @Jehan_Menthion @lemondefr C'est souvent résumé ainsi, mais je crois que c'est un peu plus complexe. Hier, @sfoucart a posté un article que j'ai trouvé intéressant https://t.co/RnvAcvzx1E
RT @yaours: Signé Charles Benbrook militant anti pesticide historique. https://t.co/nfGZQ2EuHK
RT @yaours: Signé Charles Benbrook militant anti pesticide historique. https://t.co/nfGZQ2EuHK
Signé Charles Benbrook militant anti pesticide historique.
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
@sfoucart @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz Toujours la même source [Même source: Benbrook Environ Sci Eur (2019) 31:2 https://t.co/GyLgTHBytZ …] ⤵️ On lit bien: 82. https://t.co/oETVMffWoU
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
@sfoucart @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz ⤵️ |Même source: Benbrook Environ Sci Eur (2019) 31:2 https://t.co/GyLgTHBytZ] https://t.co/1gVA3xOIbr
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
Ce ne sont pas les mêmes usages qui sont considérés, par exemple. Pour ceux qui lisent l'anglais, les articles cités par @sfoucart sont en libre accès et analysent cette question https://t.co/QNM4Ab98Kp
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
RT @sfoucart: @RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis rég…
@RoulotteScience @fmbreon @FabTdz AMHA, le papier le plus instructif sur la question (raisons de la divergence entre avis réglementaire et avis scientifique) est ici : https://t.co/4pJjZ20Kwp. Il a subi les commentaires de 10 reviewers avant d'être publié
RT @FerryDanini: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?htt…
RT @FerryDanini: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?htt…
RT @BiomimicryNorth: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/3lNLGYmxgH
RT @HygeiaAnalytics: Key insights to be had at @HygeiaAnalytics re understanding why #EPA missed so much of the boat in its assessment of #…
How did the US #EPA and #IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides? https://t.co/WmDNModscg
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
#Glyphosate is not likely to cause #cancer in humans...bc it's likely to kill us in other ways first. Large doses produce emergency room visits. Small doses produce milder effects in the same 8 classes discussed here. #GlyphosateAwareness https://t.co/yIah
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/cEzeEPCfl2 "IARC analyzed another 81 assays exploring other possible genotoxic mechanisms (mostly related to sex hormones
Comment conclure que le #Glyphosate n'est pas dangereux ? Il suffit de faire ses propres études sans les publier, et d'ignorer les études scientifiques publiées. Le tour #pesticides est joué !
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclu…
Peer-reviewed article answers the question of how and why the U.S. EPA and the EU EFSA reached diametrically opposed conclusions to #IARC about #glyphosate’s genotoxicity. READ: https://t.co/Tu1f9GqAhA Dr Charles Benbrook's article: https://t.co/r6ZeyTb
RT @SETAC_GLB: News from our associated journal: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of…
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
@txaverius @rshaffer14 Mira Javi https://t.co/30Lxq7XlP6
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
RT @MonDiDonato: How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?…
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate-based #herbicides?✍️⬇️ https://t.co/poUBqZGoUY @Cienciamundana @miquelporta @GeorgeMonbiot @alemo781 @LFerreirim @SamuelMSosa @luisglezreyes @ecologista
RT @careygillam: New analysis in Environmental Sciences Europe says in evaluating glyphosate genotoxicty, @EPA relied on 151 studies, 115 o…
@RuralCiencia Te paso un estudio que saca a la luz por qué OMS y EFSA llegaron a distintas conclusiones sobre el glifosato: la OMS partía de estudios independientes mientras que EFSA se basó en los estudios de la propia industria. Es muy interesante! https
@Tankietfield @fo0_ @EnvoyeSpecial @romaingaspar1 @lemondefr @EliseLucet @tristanwaleckx @aguirredecarcer @EliseMenand Même l'INRA évoque ce manque de consensus. Bon nombre d'articles évoquent les biais des études existantes : https://t.co/Fj6A23nl0i
In researching Glyphosate, the EPA relied heavily on unpublished regulatory studies commissioned by pesticide manufacturers. https://t.co/HcoxrcuRQ3 https://t.co/HcoxrcuRQ3
RT @Annette_LEXA: Evaluation de la génotoxicité du glyphosate CIRC/EPA : c'est le grand bazar si on ne compare pas la même chose:. les un p…
@mem_somerville @welovegv Testified as EPA procedural expert during California trial with "Monsanto papers" allegations, however Federal cases will be more stringent on "expert" testimony. Recent interest is #glyphosate genotoxicity. https://t.co/1DMsJZWH
How did the US EPA and the International Agency for Research on Cancer reach such different conclusions on whether glyphosate is a carcinogen? The EPA relied on industry sponsored, unpbublished studies. https://t.co/6ySjg71c2d
RT @Annette_LEXA: Evaluation de la génotoxicité du glyphosate CIRC/EPA : c'est le grand bazar si on ne compare pas la même chose:. les un p…
Evaluation de la génotoxicité du glyphosate CIRC/EPA : c'est le grand bazar si on ne compare pas la même chose:. les un prennent la molécule, les autres la formule herbicide, les uns prennent l' exposition des populations sans les pro, les autres avec... h
How did the US @EPA and @IARCWHO reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the #genotoxicity of #glyphosate -based herbicides? [ICYMI. Important and revealing study, because genotoxicity findings were important to IARC's evaluation] https://t.co/PP9xklFc7
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/LxmKFxPbca
@Bunker_D_ @globhumanitaire @ElPoueto Sérieusement ? Pourtant vous connaissez bien cet article https://t.co/jxUx42O3sq Et il y a une marge entre le fait de dire que des études industrielles peuvent être biaisées et dire que ce sont des lobbys qui trafiquen
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/sAeViNNkbf
RT @Pvincell: “How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate‑based herbicides?” htt…
RT @Pvincell: “How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate‑based herbicides?” htt…
“How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate‑based herbicides?” https://t.co/2HaGBj9wVj
Uhoh. https://t.co/IDcuXhSa8D
How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? https://t.co/UZAZtAGo4n EPA says Glyphosate is safe but European studies show links to cancers. Hmmm... error on the side of caution.
Yet France took the step of banning it. Go figure. I'm sure Bayer/Monsanto had a much more difficult time trying to buy off other countries like it did trump.