RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
@S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of confusion on these topics, and I've addressed them in my previous tweets. To get a better understanding of all this, please read these pap
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
@EKMelaas Eli, if you are sincrely interested in our research, I would recommend starting with this 2014 SpringerPlus article, since it provides the background to our 2017 paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: @FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna There is no secret about this any more. Look at the Erratum published to our…
@FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna There is no secret about this any more. Look at the Erratum published to our 2014 paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 Also, see this RW article: https://t.co/HItxJQKCmO We were forced to use pseudonyms to overcome the
@FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna Here are the 2 papers I suggest you read (the links work fine): 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/K2GW8tmBjA 9:26 PM - 15 Jan 2018
RT @NikolovScience: @numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda…
RT @NikolovScience: @numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda…
@numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda pushed by #AGW activists. Do you understand the scientific method and a bit of physics? Try these: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https:/
@OGClimateChange This Moment contains only my tweets, but anyway, here are the links to the papers: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfHJmy 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWhv56 These are highly technical papers with a fair amount of math in them. I hope you could handle them ...
@DuaeQuartunciae @davidappell Instead of discussing the "rules" of your thumb, focus on the evidence that our published research is presenting and pay attention to the data highlighted on my Twitter thread: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeW
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
@StormSignalSA @hockeyschtick1 Yes. Except that the thermal effect of Earth's atmosphere is not 33 K (as assumed for 40+ years) but around 90 K ... 😎 https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
@AtomsksSanakan @gddcunha1961 @boleadorcharrua @Balinteractive @RogTallbloke @cindymfernandez BTW, do you understand that a 90 K atmospheric thermal effect cannot be explained by the proposed 159 W m-2 atmospheric absoption of outgoing LW radiation? Read t
@eachus @alan_poirier @AtomsksSanakan @Balinteractive @gddcunha1961 @boleadorcharrua @RogTallbloke @cindymfernandez There is no "effective radiating altitude" in reality. IR radiation comes as a continuum from all levels of the atmosphere. The concept foll
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
@Tigerlore88 @ClimateRealists @postcardjohn @ClimateOfGavin Actually, the thermal effect of Earth's atmosphere is about 90 C, not 33 C. See this paper by Volokin & ReLlez (2014): https://t.co/tz4NKfHJmy Nevertheless, the 90 C is still fully explained b
@bobathon @theresphysics Allegedly? Look at the equation 3 used in Blanco and McCuskey 1961; Möller 1964 (and by climate science ever since). https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
@theresphysics @bobathon Read the paper! https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
@theresphysics @bobathon Au contraire, they deal with "effective radiative temp" exhaustively and show it's a misapplication of SB Law. https://t.co/AhJ2cWo4bM
@Roald_J_Larsen I agree in principle with your approach, but there is MORE! Earth's GH effect is actually ~90 C, not 33 C. See: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/r4EzhIstFD
@theresphysics @thegwpfcom I'm afraid "No, no" doesn't amount to a rebuttal. You'll have to up your game. ;-) Start with their Springer paper: https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
@jetjag100 @JamesDelingpole Try having a look at their prior paper published by Springer, it's very readable and good cutting edge science. https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
@rblourenco @ClimateHuman @DrKateMarvel @ClimateOfGavin Springier handled our first paper much more fairly. They simply posted an Erratum that discloses our names, see: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@MrDash109 Not sure about your "simple science" comment https://t.co/WYczudCnc2
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
@dkgibson02 Well, if you are interested in a new concept about the GH effect, you may want to start with this paper first: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
RT @NikolovScience: A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https…
@Canberroo @ronkorp @corybernardi Correct! The science is solid and one can see this by reading the actual papers! https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE
A fundamental #climate quantity, the STRENGTH of the "Greenhouse Effect", has been calculated WRONG for 40 years! https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/Ipv1H4qZ0X
@CohodasHoward The fully understand Nikolov & Zeller (2017), you also need to read this paper (get the PDF from the page): https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@PaulButler999 @etzpcm @Balinteractive @thegwpfcom I have linked our papers to numerous tweets before. Here they are again: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
@spoon9z @SapientHetero After this intro and side talk, it's now time for you to read our papers staring with V&R 2014: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 This is a key study!
@PlancksLaw No, you are mistaken! Vololin & ReLlez (2014) has NEVER been retracted, see: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
@LauraEllenDee Laura, you might like these 2 recent paper on the Greenhouse effect: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/ALWU3KnQzE
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know that the 90 C atmos. "greenhouse effect" on Earth is all due to AIR PRESSURE, not 'greenhouse' back radiat…
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
@alexaraujoc @AndrewDessler @airscottdenning @theresphysics @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @EthonRaptor @RogerPielkeJr @curryja Te is NOT a real temperature! Satellites measure outgoing IR flux, not Te. Read this paper to understand: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@AndrewDessler @airscottdenning @theresphysics @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @EthonRaptor @RogerPielkeJr @curryja Tequiv is a MATHEMATICAL CONSTRUCT, not a real temp. Read the literature, and especially this paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@scottwahlstrom @icarus62 The 250-255 K estimate of Earth's temp without an atmosphere is INCORRECT (outdated science!), Read this article: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@theresphysics @airscottdenning @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @EthonRaptor @RogerPielkeJr @curryja Effective temps (Te) have NO physical relationship to surface temperatures for purely mathematical reasons. Read: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@EthonRaptor @airscottdenning @theresphysics @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @RogerPielkeJr @curryja We address this in Volokin & ReLlez (2014). Please read the paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 Our Tna formula is validated using NASA data!
@airscottdenning @theresphysics @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @EthonRaptor @RogerPielkeJr @curryja Scott, we've been saying from day one (from 2011) that Te is non-physical. This is the topic of our 2014 paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@EthonRaptor @airscottdenning @theresphysics @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @RogerPielkeJr @curryja @arthursmith No such assumption! Read Volokin & ReLlez (2014) before voicing opinions: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 Why do people talk before they understand?
@theresphysics @airscottdenning @el_guapo001 @kmpetersson @EthonRaptor @RogerPielkeJr @curryja The thermal effect of Earth's atmosphere is 90 K, not 33 K. The 33 K GE estimate is mathematically WRONG, see: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
@icarus62 @dan613 @terrymorse @StormSignalSA You need to read our first paper to understand that the 33 K GE is based on a mathematically WRONG calculation: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@AlanJones @KinoGate Or if that was too difficult for you, just follow this twitter account https://t.co/Hu8bvFx6o8
@StormSignalSA @StuartMac10 Please read these 2 papers first BEFORE trying to discuss our science: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/ALWU3KnQzE
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": https://t.co/tz4NKfHJmy https://t.co/Ln7dNYHpbO
@StormSignalSA @DrFunkySpoon Of their two published papers, the first is less 'controversial', but still important for its novel findings. https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
@JamesAbbott2013 @NikolovScience By the way James, the "entire physics of the GHE" is based on a misapplication of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. See https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke
@LeonardCohen2 @dblebuck @JdavisWx Then read our 2 papers instead of wasting time here arguing: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 https://t.co/ALWU3KnQzE
RT @NikolovScience: The NEW #climate PARADIGM is in these 2 open-access peer-reviewed papers: 2014: https://t.co/tz4NKfHJmy 2017: https://…