RT @NikolovScience: @psud12 @theresphysics @DavidAHoward @SapiensCato @geoffmprice @RogTallbloke @EthonRaptor @badgerbod Well, there is a n…
RT @NikolovScience: @psud12 @theresphysics @DavidAHoward @SapiensCato @geoffmprice @RogTallbloke @EthonRaptor @badgerbod Well, there is a n…
@psud12 @theresphysics @DavidAHoward @SapiensCato @geoffmprice @RogTallbloke @EthonRaptor @badgerbod Well, there is a new climate-science paradigm on the horizon now. Read these papers, Pete.: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE
@memcculloch Mike, FYI these calculations based on a simple (isothermal) form of the S-B radiation law are NOT applicable to spherical objects due to Holder's inequality between integrals. See this 2014 paper for the correct formula to estimating T of airl
RT @NikolovScience: @JaggerMickOZ Thank you, Mike. For best understanding of our new concept, I suggest you start your reading with our 201…
RT @NikolovScience: @JaggerMickOZ Thank you, Mike. For best understanding of our new concept, I suggest you start your reading with our 201…
@JaggerMickOZ Thank you, Mike. For best understanding of our new concept, I suggest you start your reading with our 2014 paper, which discusses the magnitude of Earth's atmospheric thermal effect: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another false statement in NCA4 is the assertion that the "natural GH effect" raises Earth's temperature by 33 C. This…
Another false statement in NCA4 is the assertion that the "natural GH effect" raises Earth's temperature by 33 C. This is based on mathematically WRONG calculation: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 The actual thermal effect is ~90 C and it's all due to pressure &am
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
Take a look at this tread, @GillesnFio : https://t.co/YCin9a1elc
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
RT @NikolovScience: Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the…
Another MAJOR problem with the radiative GH theory: The GH Effect is measured via the outgoing IR flux absorbed by the atmosphere (see https://t.co/V7YkvwnQi0). This flux is ~159 W m-2. However, 1. This flux cannot explain the 90 K Atmos. Thermal Effect (h
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
RT @NikolovScience: @S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of c…
@S0_aurora @SConwaySmith @scotpolitik @dahlqje @gregoriobaq1 @MhehedZherting @RogTallbloke @BrianSJ3 There is lots of confusion on these topics, and I've addressed them in my previous tweets. To get a better understanding of all this, please read these pap
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…
@EKMelaas Eli, if you are sincrely interested in our research, I would recommend starting with this 2014 SpringerPlus article, since it provides the background to our 2017 paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: @FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna There is no secret about this any more. Look at the Erratum published to our…
@FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna There is no secret about this any more. Look at the Erratum published to our 2014 paper: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 Also, see this RW article: https://t.co/HItxJQKCmO We were forced to use pseudonyms to overcome the
@FraserMacLeod5 @angelangulus @cathmckenna Here are the 2 papers I suggest you read (the links work fine): 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/K2GW8tmBjA 9:26 PM - 15 Jan 2018
RT @NikolovScience: @numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda…
RT @NikolovScience: @numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda…
@numbers_bobby @GovInslee You should read our published papers instead of listening to nonsensical political propaganda pushed by #AGW activists. Do you understand the scientific method and a bit of physics? Try these: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https:/
@OGClimateChange This Moment contains only my tweets, but anyway, here are the links to the papers: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfHJmy 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWhv56 These are highly technical papers with a fair amount of math in them. I hope you could handle them ...
@DuaeQuartunciae @davidappell Instead of discussing the "rules" of your thumb, focus on the evidence that our published research is presenting and pay attention to the data highlighted on my Twitter thread: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeW
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
@StormSignalSA @hockeyschtick1 Yes. Except that the thermal effect of Earth's atmosphere is not 33 K (as assumed for 40+ years) but around 90 K ... 😎 https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
RT @NikolovScience: Did you know - the presence of #atmosphere raises Earth's temperature by some 90 C, not 33 C as currently assumed? htt…