@VirtualAstro Before endorsing pure propaganda like this, please take some time to read a different, real science based explanation of the reality of climate change and it's causes by @NikolovScience Time to get back to evidence based science instead of j
RT @NikolovScience: @hockeyschtick1 @rln_nelson @brad_schrag @warpmatt @alexandrepretto @daninot @safbf There is no "effective emission lev…
RT @NikolovScience: @hockeyschtick1 @rln_nelson @brad_schrag @warpmatt @alexandrepretto @daninot @safbf There is no "effective emission lev…
RT @NikolovScience: @hockeyschtick1 @rln_nelson @brad_schrag @warpmatt @alexandrepretto @daninot @safbf There is no "effective emission lev…
RT @NikolovScience: @hockeyschtick1 @rln_nelson @brad_schrag @warpmatt @alexandrepretto @daninot @safbf There is no "effective emission lev…
@hockeyschtick1 @rln_nelson @brad_schrag @warpmatt @alexandrepretto @daninot @safbf There is no "effective emission level" in reality. It's a mathematical concept stemming from incorrect identification of the effective emission temperature Te (~255 K for E
RT @NikolovScience: @KHayhoe Dear Katharine, there is new published research showing that the radiative "greenhouse" concept of #ClimateCh…
@KHayhoe Dear Katharine, there is new published research showing that the radiative "greenhouse" concept of #ClimateChange has been misconstrued for 190 years. The atmospheric thermal effect is NOT caused by trace gases: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. http
RT @NikolovScience: @ApafarkasAgmand Yes, I'm aware of this info. The blog article makes some errors, though, like comparing a planet's sur…
RT @NikolovScience: @ApafarkasAgmand Yes, I'm aware of this info. The blog article makes some errors, though, like comparing a planet's sur…
@ApafarkasAgmand Yes, I'm aware of this info. The blog article makes some errors, though, like comparing a planet's surface temp. to a black-body flat-disk temp., which is physically nonsensical. Black-body temperatures have no relevance to planet surface
@4TimesAYear @ccdeditor Excellent! @NikolovScience @LarkRellez are extremely relevant https://t.co/3AOAd1Gd4P
RT @RogTallbloke: Well I would call it groupthink rather than conspiracy Guy. Thomas Khun called it "normal science". Paradigm shifts take…
RT @RogTallbloke: Well I would call it groupthink rather than conspiracy Guy. Thomas Khun called it "normal science". Paradigm shifts take…
Well I would call it groupthink rather than conspiracy Guy. Thomas Khun called it "normal science". Paradigm shifts take time due to institutional inertia, but you should study these two papers carefully. https://t.co/AhJ2cW6tke https://t.co/j2b3yR0BKY htt
RT @NikolovScience: @JaggerMickOZ @RonCrunt @AndrewRiddell1 @Redbaiternz This is actually our second paper. The first one discussing the pr…
RT @NikolovScience: @JaggerMickOZ @RonCrunt @AndrewRiddell1 @Redbaiternz This is actually our second paper. The first one discussing the pr…
RT @NikolovScience: @JaggerMickOZ @RonCrunt @AndrewRiddell1 @Redbaiternz This is actually our second paper. The first one discussing the pr…
@JaggerMickOZ @RonCrunt @AndrewRiddell1 @Redbaiternz This is actually our second paper. The first one discussing the problem with calculating the strength of the atmospheric "greenhouse" effect is available at: https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6
@bobathon @RogerPalfree @rln_nelson @nevaudit @SConwaySmith @warpmatt @icarus62 @EstBrahphet @ClimatePoet @davidappell @EcoSenseNow @hockeyschtick1 @StormSignalSA @LarkRellez @patricksavalle @Cheshire__red @JunkScience Hey Bob, as a physicist you should be
@HandsomeMUC @123koenig @TheTinLoaf @Wetzelstrom @welt Die 400ppm CO2 sind unstrittig. Es ist aber wissenschaftlich strittig, ob der CO2-Anstieg tatsächlich (1) für einen Temperaturanstieg in den letzten 20 Jahren verantwortlich ist und (2) ob es tatsächli
@JohnPalkovic @warpmatt @icarus62 @RogerPalfree @rln_nelson @ClimatePoet @SConwaySmith @davidappell @EcoSenseNow @hockeyschtick1 @StormSignalSA @LarkRellez @patricksavalle @Cheshire__red John, since you claim to understand physics and math, take a look at
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: Paper 1 of the NEW #ClimateChange PARADIGM exposes a major math error in estimating the "natural Greenhouse Effect": ht…
RT @NikolovScience: @GreenOlivine @gjvu @RogerPielkeJr The 440 K for Mercury is a CALCULATION (no a measurement) made by NASA using a mathe…
@GreenOlivine @gjvu @RogerPielkeJr The 440 K for Mercury is a CALCULATION (no a measurement) made by NASA using a mathematically wrong formula that does not properly account for spherical geometry. This is all explained in our 2014 paper: https://t.co/tz4N
@RogTallbloke @EcoSenseNow @rln_nelson @StormSignalSA @Cheshire__red @GuitarMan59LP @hockeyschtick1 @DenierBot @davidappell @LarkRellez @patricksavalle No, they cannot wiggle in this way, because our 2014 paper conclusively showed that the 33 GE estimate h
@EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA @RogTallbloke @rln_nelson @Cheshire__red @GuitarMan59LP @hockeyschtick1 @DenierBot @davidappell @LarkRellez @patricksavalle Patrick, your guys (i.e. Happer & co) say 33K is due to GHGs, because they have not read our 2014 pa
@EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @RogTallbloke @Cheshire__red @GuitarMan59LP @hockeyschtick1 @DenierBot @davidappell @LarkRellez @patricksavalle Really?! How did you come up with this conclusion, Patrick? Have you read our 2014 paper (https://t.co/t
@icarus62 @NikolovScience @Heardbeast @ClimatePoet @SConwaySmith @davidappell @EcoSenseNow @hockeyschtick1 @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @patricksavalle @Cheshire__red 255K is a calculation applying Stefan Boltzmann's law to a flat disk and dividing by surfac
RT @NikolovScience: @SConwaySmith @EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA Yes, because of the nonlinear relationship between temperature and energy flu…
@SConwaySmith @EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA Yes, because of the nonlinear relationship between temperature and energy flux as per S-B radiation law, average fluxes do not relate well to average temperatures. This is a central point we discuss in our 2014 pap
@AndrewDessler @kmpetersson @EcoSenseNow @davidappell @GuitarMan59LP @Cheshire__red @hockeyschtick1 @DenierBot @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @LarkRellez @patricksavalle BTW, we cited your 2010 paper in our recent publications as an example of science mistakes
RT @NikolovScience: @NpoleanBlonAprt Sure, Devan. Here are the 2 main papers in a suggested order to read: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. ht…
RT @NikolovScience: @NpoleanBlonAprt Sure, Devan. Here are the 2 main papers in a suggested order to read: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. ht…
@NpoleanBlonAprt Sure, Devan. Here are the 2 main papers in a suggested order to read: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE Also take a look at these Moments: https://t.co/v6t7hCp1ab
@Rail4Eva @EcoSenseNow There's only one world view that treated the Earth as flat (the AGW crowd). https://t.co/eI5snqpwaz
RT @NikolovScience: @Woods8Craig @EcoSenseNow @patricksavalle @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @Cheshire__red Craig, the radiative effects of wat…
RT @NikolovScience: @Woods8Craig @EcoSenseNow @patricksavalle @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @Cheshire__red Craig, the radiative effects of wat…
@Woods8Craig @EcoSenseNow @patricksavalle @StormSignalSA @rln_nelson @Cheshire__red Craig, the radiative effects of water vapor at night that you describe is real, but it's small and LOCAL in scope. It does not explain the GLOBAL long-term thermal effect o
RT @NikolovScience: @EcoSenseNow @cbfool @StormSignalSA Patrick, lets stop using the erroneous 33 K "Greenhouse effect"! The real thermal e…
@EcoSenseNow @cbfool @StormSignalSA Patrick, lets stop using the erroneous 33 K "Greenhouse effect"! The real thermal effect of Earth's atmosphere is ~90 K. The 33 K estimate is a product of WRONG math and is physically completely meaningless. This is thor
RT @NikolovScience: @Cheshire__red @EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA @GillesnFio I have had extensive discussions with Monckton. He is a firm bel…
RT @NikolovScience: @Cheshire__red @EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA @GillesnFio I have had extensive discussions with Monckton. He is a firm bel…
@Cheshire__red @EcoSenseNow @StormSignalSA @GillesnFio I have had extensive discussions with Monckton. He is a firm believer in the radiative "Greenhouse" theory as advertised and that #CO2 is a "greenhouse gas". He also does not understand our 2014 paper
RT @NikolovScience: @tubaboyz You can download our 2 papers from these links: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE https:/…
@tubaboyz You can download our 2 papers from these links: 1. https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6 2. https://t.co/SgWzeWz5WE https://t.co/rlVB2MCJvV