RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on golden rice etc., or the er... 'talented' Mr. Lynas https://t.co/rz13mOJPqL @BBCr4today https://t.co/Uk9BukzX9k
RT @TimothyWSchwab: .@neiltyson Sort of. Science is highly specialized, many scientific topics don't have "legions" of scientists with rele…
.@neiltyson Sort of. Science is highly specialized, many scientific topics don't have "legions" of scientists with relevant expertise. Setting this aside, don't GMOs qualify as "scientifically controversial," acc. to ur def? https://t.co/OuLKqWae5p https:
@Suffolkbeeman @GeorginaDowns43 @michaelgove @Natures_Voice @suffolkwildlife @stedsbc @DefraGovUK Gove promised Gene Editing and other bio technologies to further food production. He along with the rest of the tories claims there is a scientific consensus
@scifri How does this video--or any of the other "fact-checked resources" and "science facts" you are promoting on this issue--demonstrate a "scientific consensus?" And what about the fact that 100s of scientists have said no consensus exists? https://t.co
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @BarbKueber: "Decisions on the future of our food and agriculture should not be based on misleading and misrepresentative claims by an i…
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
"Decisions on the future of our food and agriculture should not be based on misleading and misrepresentative claims by an internal circle of likeminded stakeholders that a ‘scientific consensus’ exists on GMO safety." https://t.co/BKjt8g9DJT
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @JodiKoberinski: @trevorcharles @BotanyBert @Olivefarmer @keithkloor Safety. What do you mean what do we mean?! I’ve posted the publishe…
RT @JodiKoberinski: @trevorcharles @BotanyBert @Olivefarmer @keithkloor Safety. What do you mean what do we mean?! I’ve posted the publishe…
No scientific consensus on #GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/U7sz5VERa8
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
@IRobertIgnatius @FarmFairyCrafts @kavn @smuckers @fuller_derek @8extremes @VirginiaInCal @rosevine3 @LLaws2 @truthglow (1) Is this a kind of provocation? (2) How could you have missed this: https://t.co/Au53RJiBuQ? Please read it carefully. And if you hav
@paw el tema es que el jitomate y al aguacate no tienen denominación de origen legalmente, pero sí el mezcal, el tequila, el mango ataulfo, el habanero... seguro se pondrán de acuerdo, te mando un abrazo fuerte. https://t.co/tocDFSaBd2
@thackerpd @Eaterofsun @ErikMConway @JPvanYpersele @NaomiOreskes @dannyhakim @monicaeng One last try here: do you agree with Hilbeck or WHO? So https://t.co/jVy9rYyUAd or https://t.co/zapTdMoFVA
@mark_lynas @ErikMConway @Eaterofsun @JPvanYpersele @NaomiOreskes Oh, the "GMO consensus" trope. You've been trying to sell that for years. Experts led by Angelika Hilbeck made that point some time ago https://t.co/10ntfmjcGO And @dannyhakim at the NY Time
@kjhvm Sorry, there is NO consensus on safety. Check this link: https://t.co/mN0ZpSJ5Ob
@hbottemiller Hoping this works. If not, email me: [email protected]">@gmail.com">[email protected] https://t.co/kCaqt4Vwjb
@hbottemiller Try this. https://t.co/mN0ZpSJ5Ob Reach out to Mike Hansen at Consumers' Union. Many interviews on Food Sleuth Radio with experts who explain potential harm.
Angelika Hilbeck - One of the authors of this article was recently in Nagpur to deliver a lecture at NEERI... https://t.co/EIXkKSnCpe
Smith 'study' not Shape-worthy or particularly helpful, but @lauren_mazzo's main point ("We still need a lot more research") echoed by many scientists/experts seldom heard in MSM https://t.co/OuLKqWae5p https://t.co/zuAHBMyVXi
RT @FoodSovereignGH: @joevarock Yes, and this peer-reviewed statement is from witches! "No scientific consensus on GMO safety" | SpringerLi…
@joevarock Yes, and this peer-reviewed statement is from witches! "No scientific consensus on GMO safety" | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
@tracesheehan @TimothyAWise @TimothyWSchwab Many authors of https://t.co/jbesoGzkVE have exactly that bkground. & history shows it is premature for a consensus https://t.co/NU2BYZPoQg
@BioBeef @Erst_Officer @WyoWeeds @wapaDB @foodevomovie I was looking at Hilbeck et al., 2015. https://t.co/ubtgBOztFd
@ReOpen911_info @UnMondeRiant @Miastor_LCPH La communication du CRIIGEN que vous partagez est rattachée à une publi manipulatrice : https://t.co/0pLcwlsBLz
@waltzing_piglet @ploscargutierre @emiliusnotes @jmmulet En cuanto a la seguridad de los GMOs, no hay un "y punto". Se requiere "análisis caso por caso", y no hay consenso https://t.co/UqQBc4M4Sh
@Hiddemhigh @decorrespondent Het gaat niet om wat Robinson vindt over consensus maar om ENSSER statement, en dat weet jij ook. https://t.co/HyKaucfp5s
@BeatSpath Besides the issue of scientific debate on GMO safety (https://t.co/qNPVC1quui) we call GM RR soy 'toxic' because of its link with Roundup.
@deekatello @kevinfolta Kevin made many misleading statements. 1. The supposed "consensus" is fictional. Med. Science hasn't even began yet https://t.co/a3yLig8yuA
RT @bluezonemktg: No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/D63eH7j2vQ https://t.co/MPz1916fTJ
RT @TimothyWSchwab: @caitlindewey Even creator of first GMO (tomato) calls "consensus" talking point 'unscientific, illogical, & absurd' ht…
RT @TimothyWSchwab: @caitlindewey Even creator of first GMO (tomato) calls "consensus" talking point 'unscientific, illogical, & absurd' ht…
RT @TimothyWSchwab: @torrHL @Wonkblog @aaas @tminus5 Not exactly https://t.co/ouliZ8TRHM
@torrHL @Wonkblog @aaas @tminus5 Not exactly https://t.co/ouliZ8TRHM
@caitlindewey Even creator of first GMO (tomato) calls "consensus" talking point 'unscientific, illogical, & absurd' https://t.co/NsBPULuJ8x https://t.co/2gH688Z80M
@caitlindewey U cite 'widespread consensus GM crops r safe' then immed note environmental safety concerns. And there's also this: https://t.co/OuLKqWae5p
Nie ma naukowego konsensusu w sprawie GMO No scientific consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/QBKi8omEuh #enveurope
RT @bluezonemktg: No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/D63eH7j2vQ https://t.co/MPz1916fTJ
@SamSeder @_michaelbrooks Every now and then GMO safety comes up on @majorityfm. This might be informative: https://t.co/0mpNdVtyhG
RT @donaldorth: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/gruqlC1gjE
RT @donaldorth: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/gruqlC1gjE
RT @donaldorth: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/gruqlC1gjE
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/gruqlC1gjE
@BillNyeSaves 7) There are 100s of PhD scientists on record w/ concerns abt #GMOs; we heard not one on ur show https://t.co/OuLKqWae5p
An interesting article about the lack of consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/jgrYRjl3Ph #enveurope
No consensus on #Roundup, none on #GMO foods. Makes you think. https://t.co/hDXK0vM4jF https://t.co/pkXF20Gzt5
RT @ADevotedYogi: Did you know that there is No Scientific Consensus on #GMOsafety!?! https://t.co/NxSGderNI1 #gmo #gmos https://t.co/EXR0…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Did you know that there is No Scientific Consensus on #GMOsafety!?! https://t.co/NxSGderNI1 #gmo #gmos https://t.co/EXR0…
Did you know that there is No Scientific Consensus on #GMOsafety!?! https://t.co/NxSGderNI1 #gmo #gmos https://t.co/EXR0t4fUns
RT @JeffK_BanGMOs: “No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al; 1-24-15 https://t.co/vaZeNZjU8v https://t.co/FfdKX9l…
RT @JeffK_BanGMOs: “No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al; 1-24-15 https://t.co/vaZeNZjU8v https://t.co/FfdKX9l…
@JoelAchenbach Essential reading for all journos writing/opining about GMOs: https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
@caitlindewey GMO "consensus" is industry talking point. If you want the other side of story, let's talk sometime https://t.co/9mGAslxokw https://t.co/SRq8KQfxYv
No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/gpKBEWk92L #enveurope
RT @wapaDB: @PlantEvolution @dannyhakim @nytimes Hilbeck author of this opinion paper, with who's who of anti-GMO activists. https://t.co/…
RT @wapaDB: @PlantEvolution @dannyhakim @nytimes Hilbeck author of this opinion paper, with who's who of anti-GMO activists. https://t.co/…
@PlantEvolution @dannyhakim @nytimes Hilbeck author of this opinion paper, with who's who of anti-GMO activists. https://t.co/xXxJ8f5icA
RT @EATegrity_Sonia: Just look at history of #formaldehyde in food products & #MSG, #DDT #ethylene dibromide #FoodDyes ~ of course no conse…
RT @EATegrity_Sonia: More reason for a prudent healthcare policy to safeguard public against the unknown @DAFF_Ministry @HealthZA https://t…
Just look at history of #formaldehyde in food products & #MSG, #DDT #ethylene dibromide #FoodDyes ~ of course no consensus #Bought https://t.co/foQj3t5iWv
More reason for a prudent healthcare policy to safeguard public against the unknown @DAFF_Ministry @HealthZA https://t.co/foQj3t5iWv
No scientific consensus on GMO safety @EPA @USDAFoodSafety @US_FDA https://t.co/7hhEMGwz3g
Starting the morn dealing with anoth anonymous #gmo troll that (not who) Obstinately refuses facts/reality. Wake up! https://t.co/9mGAslxokw https://t.co/n0S9Z3EDWy
@_devangm U keep struggling 2 assert scientific consensus. doesn't exist and misses point https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
"Claims of consensus on the safety of GMOs are not supported by an objective analysis of the refereed literature." https://t.co/KwMWYBoQ7P
RT @TimothyWSchwab: @nprDanCharles u report almost all scientists think #GMOs safe. Yet Pew did not survey scientists. Neither did NAS. htt…
@nprDanCharles "Only 14 percent's beliefs match the reality." What is "reality?" Scientific opinion is divided, no?. https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
@nprDanCharles u report almost all scientists think #GMOs safe. Yet Pew did not survey scientists. Neither did NAS. https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
Trick question: They cite sources that demonstrate consensus, like @theNASEM rather than op-eds that cherry-pick. https://t.co/gk1CJK5FZl
@briantkennedy @WilliamBuliziuk pew has to define its terms. What is "expert?" What is "consensus?" What about: https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
@surveyfunk so how do u square ur expansive language about #gmo consensus with the scientific record that says opp? https://t.co/9mGAslxokw
@surveyfunk There has never been a survey of GMO experts, so y do you say "consensus?" Which experts are u citing? https://t.co/9mGAslOZc4
RT @keithkloor: Ah, the anti-GMO equivalent to the infamous "no consensus" Oregon Petition. https://t.co/WKTdXc3Tfw https://t.co/mRsokvJsNO