RT @Alexander_Lees: @prometheusgreen @Iceblue52Roth @sfchronicle 1) You are in contact with Monsanto lobbyists, fine by me, but denial unde…
RT @Alexander_Lees: @prometheusgreen @Iceblue52Roth @sfchronicle 1) You are in contact with Monsanto lobbyists, fine by me, but denial unde…
RT @Alexander_Lees: @prometheusgreen @Iceblue52Roth @sfchronicle 1) You are in contact with Monsanto lobbyists, fine by me, but denial unde…
RT @GMOFreeUSA: There is no scientific consensus on GMO safety. https://t.co/8tlOJXay8e
RT @GMOFreeUSA: There is no scientific consensus on GMO safety. https://t.co/8tlOJXay8e
RT @GMOFreeUSA: There is no scientific consensus on GMO safety. https://t.co/8tlOJXay8e
There is no scientific consensus on GMO safety. https://t.co/8tlOJXay8e
@sense_strand @FilthNerd @tictoc https://t.co/AnB1iYlqdd https://t.co/Ogz7NvY92G https://t.co/x59HOVjABL All I'm saying is there is reason to be concerned and question certain things. Especially those concerning our health and wellbeing
@IvoVegter @EATegrity_Sonia @dailymaverick @ExtinctionR Oh, these independent researchers? https://t.co/t9DeqhowJz
@agritof80 https://t.co/tlMgwzl3le Il est généralement reconnu que les performances & l'evaluation systémique de l'outil OGM ne fait pas de consensus scientifique. Je ne nie pas, je fais des recherches et j'élabore des analyses, qui ne sont pas des pos
@KargalNoz Bravo, vous avez fini par trouver un texte qui dit ce que vous avez envie d'entendre ! D'ailleurs sur ce site on peut lire qu'il n'y a pas de consensus en faveur des OGM : https://t.co/5uU9JRaf5C
No scientific consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/qYSDNi8DsM
No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/lCfbgT5ZAf
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @LuchoBerkman: @Shora @waactis @EcologistasCLM @victorpasc @ecologistas @plansin_fisuras @eldiarioes Muy Breve: 1) Lxs científicxs no e…
No depth antiGMO activists will sink to. No spine these scientists have to publish in garbage journals. No doubt on the SC on gmos.
@sense_strand @cnni No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
@sense_strand @akwasisarpong READ: From a reputed peer-reviewed scientific journal: "No scientific consensus on GMO safety" | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
@franscobhanku Then be informed with this. https://t.co/JuZj3q9SyO
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
@GidMK We found your claims that #GMOs have conclusively been proven to be safe pretty interesting. Want to provide any evidence to back this statement up? These scientists strongly disagree with you: https://t.co/9jIX5DTmYT
@mortenkj @TheYellowPete @KennethNrgaard @ZetlandMagasin Det er vist et temmelig kækt statement, som ikke alle er enige i https://t.co/jwLWOjoWTh
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | Environmental Sciences Europe | Full Text https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
@Rinascita92 @vicfc7 @kcedano @daniela_oaks @elnocturno @jmmulet No seas ignorante no importa si es una persona o mil, lo que importa es el contenido que hace evidente tu ideología falaz de consenso y que no lees. Pero bueno, atascate con 300 más https://t
@Rinascita92 @vicfc7 @kcedano @daniela_oaks @elnocturno @jmmulet Más del discurso de ventas del consenso? Lo que enseñan a los tecnólogos para comercialuzar sus productos "biofortificados" 😂https://t.co/F0ZuED49AL
@CowVetPaul @ClaytonRobins I'm not agreeing with the position, but I did find the article they are referring to. The link given in the Ghana news online article takes you to a journal called Environmental Sciences Europe, an open access article you can rea
RT @LuchoBerkman: @Shora @waactis @EcologistasCLM @victorpasc @ecologistas @plansin_fisuras @eldiarioes Muy Breve: 1) Lxs científicxs no e…
RT @LuchoBerkman: @Shora @waactis @EcologistasCLM @victorpasc @ecologistas @plansin_fisuras @eldiarioes Muy Breve: 1) Lxs científicxs no e…
RT @LuchoBerkman: @Shora @waactis @EcologistasCLM @victorpasc @ecologistas @plansin_fisuras @eldiarioes Muy Breve: 1) Lxs científicxs no e…
@Shora @waactis @EcologistasCLM @victorpasc @ecologistas @plansin_fisuras @eldiarioes Muy Breve: 1) Lxs científicxs no están de acuerdo sobre su seguridad: https://t.co/iWc2rNNtjf 2) Hay problemas ambientales graves, como resistencias a glifosato o a BT a
@ColegioNal_mx @amciencias @ibt_unam Cuando los promotores de transgénicos pretenden dicotomizar entre promotores y detractores con la idiotez de que no entienden la tecnología. Aquí 300 científicos que no están de acuerdo https://t.co/F0ZuED49AL
@david_corona @IBDeditorials No sabes que #Monsanto le escribe los artículos a Henry I. Miller? https://t.co/HstuTSiQ8J Además, una gran cantidad de científicos no comparte tu opinión, aquí una muestra https://t.co/F0ZuED49AL
@AlpSirman https://t.co/pBsHa1CAyS https://t.co/lqnDAWeOsO Kesinlikle güvenilir demememiz gerektiğine işaret eden 2 makale sadece. Daha da bulunabilir. Bu işler ticari meseleler olduğundan büyük sermaye sahipleri para ile bazı işleri oldurma yetisine sahip
RT @JeffK_BanGMOs: @NonGMOProject "No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 7…
RT @HomegrownJoan: #SciComm To all those that say the science is settled on GMO safety: https://t.co/sUmNAeOaYu
RT @HomegrownJoan: #SciComm To all those that say the science is settled on GMO safety: https://t.co/sUmNAeOaYu
RT @JeffK_BanGMOs: @NonGMOProject "No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 7…
@NonGMOProject "No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 7, Issue 4; January 24, 2015 https://t.co/03yJFDRw1W
@jmmulet Este artículo habla de los GMO en general https://t.co/nogAmjboTm Igualmente, creo recordar que el título de su libro habla de los transgénicos en general ("Transgénicos sin miedo")
@jmmulet Disculpe la insistencia, pero me gustaría conocer su opinión sobre este (y otros) artículos que señalan que la evidencia sobre la seguridad de los transgénicos no es clara (tanto a favor como en contra). https://t.co/wb3APu3XjR
@jmmulet Desde la total ignorancia sobre un tema alejado de mi campo, ¿Es tan clara la evidencia sobre la seguridad de los transgénicos como dice? Pregunto tras echar un vistazo a papers como este https://t.co/nogAmjboTm
@egirrrlie There are significant scientific doubts about #GMO and health. https://t.co/h2NixqqZQ7 There are lots of peer reviewed studies showing harm. #GMO approved on unpublished studies done by companies. Not science in my view
There is no consensus on #GMO safety. #Roundup is used on most #GMO crops and is a probable carcinogen. Where is @mark_lynas's science? #NPC https://t.co/h2NixqqZQ7 https://t.co/scVIzFN8Q6
Very tired of claims that #GMO concern= #AntiVax or #ClimateSceptic. No #scientific consensus on #GMO safety. #NPC https://t.co/f90XdjvkTi … @mark_lynas stood with #ClimateSceptic to promote #GMOs
@mark_lynas talking about why he changed his mind about #GMOs at @FarmWritersNSW. Think he still needs to check his research as no consensus on #GMO safety. https://t.co/f90XdjvkTi #agchatoz #agriculture
Very tired of claims that #GMO concern= #AntiVax or #ClimateSceptic. No #scientific consensus on #GMO safety. https://t.co/f90XdjvkTi @mark_lynas stood with #ClimateSceptic to promote #GMOs https://t.co/cN9wdGeo1J
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on #GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
No scientific consensus on #GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
How about you and WSJ and Lynas start here if claiming "scientific consensus on GMO safety" @radioritson https://t.co/6lRCghPail
@prometheusgreen @ignaziano @_beccaharrison But the review wasn't conducted by an independent scientist, the lead reported a conflict of interest in the paper (excised below). Moreover: https://t.co/mFQyzIIpje https://t.co/E07zzlmdjl
@prometheusgreen @Iceblue52Roth @sfchronicle 1) You are in contact with Monsanto lobbyists, fine by me, but denial undermines your position 2) There is no consensus on GM crops https://t.co/mFQyzIIpje 3) There is ample evidence that impacts on biodiversity
Last word: Rather than continue Twitter debate, will offer my own followers/readers a paper that suggests GMO safety is NOT settled science. Written by real scientists with PhDs and it's OA. Agree with it or not, it is science: https://t.co/lNnzySiGsc h
@Ayelis @PinealP0wer @MonsantoCo No scientific consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/YSVm0sE6Kt
@FerGutierrezZ1 @FerHaus1 @MiguelMirandaBo No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/PyPA1SjV6s
@niederhuth @Afsafrica Really? Where have you been staying all this while? Are the independent experts who appear as signatories to this peer-reviewed and reputable scientific journal Environmental Sciences Europe also not scientists? "No scientific consen
No scientific consensus on GMO safety https://t.co/PP917ONTfa | What is ESAFF -@EsaffHQ up to? @PelumKenya @NeverEndingFood @KBiodiv @PanAfricanists @Afsafrica @spiritstalker https://t.co/MqSqNnwgAG
@EsaffHQ @spiritstalker PLEASE NOTE! No scientific consensus on GMO safety! | https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/PP917ONTfa
@mark_lynas This study? https://t.co/02c1UJ3nTM What's the background on this "statement signed by over 300 scientists, academics and legal experts"?
RT @Afsafrica: @spiritstalker @mcatch22 @NaomiAKlein The global body of scientific knowledge advances through research, peer review and pub…
RT @Afsafrica: @spiritstalker @mcatch22 @NaomiAKlein The global body of scientific knowledge advances through research, peer review and pub…
@spiritstalker @mcatch22 @NaomiAKlein The global body of scientific knowledge advances through research, peer review and publication. The GM industry doesn't play by these rules so: 1) none of their 'research' is peer reviewed, 2) dont believe their bullsh
@gominolasdpetro Tienes estos 300 científicos; https://t.co/NdN7dT3c3g y en España, por ejemplo, a la biotecnóloga Gabriela Vázquez y al ingeniero agrónomo Jose Ramón Olarieta, que además acaba de sacar un libro sobre este tema. En este programa puedes esc
No scientific consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/ovMoGed39X #enveurope
RT @FoodSovereignGH: No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/xduEAMycG7
No scientific consensus on GMO safety | SpringerLink https://t.co/xduEAMycG7
RT @JeffK_BanGMOs: “No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 7, Issue 4; Janu…
“No scientific consensus on GMO safety,” by Angelika Hilbeck et al, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 7, Issue 4; January 24, 2015 https://t.co/03yJFDRw1W #enveurope
RT @TimothyWSchwab: This piece illustrates well some perennial probs sci journos have on this topic. It cites mult "experts" w/ undisclosed…
This piece illustrates well some perennial probs sci journos have on this topic. It cites mult "experts" w/ undisclosed conflicts of interests & misrepresents key stats (it's 90% of AAAS members, not "scientists.") Scientists, in fact, have divided opi
"Decisions on the future of our food and agriculture should not be based on misleading and misrepresentative claims by an internal circle of likeminded stakeholders that a ‘scientific consensus’ exists on GMO safety." https://t.co/aBesu9zsIj
@WillowLymeInfo @JustMissEmma @schoolbalance @tarajmoriarty @HollyRubenstein @HolocaustMuseum Meanwhile in Europe... More than half of EU officially bans genetically modified crops https://t.co/Jeofs3nCS0 Based on... No scientific consensus on GMO safet
So... I may have reacted badly to this share earlier today. But this is one of the arguments made by anti-GMO folk that I find most infuriating. It is totally disingenuous to try to prove that there is no "scientific consensus" on GMO safety. Take on the a
@_devangm ok. just for the record... https://t.co/IOYcPWImzq
@MarranitoDePan @ElGatoyLaCaja Gracias igual. Quizás no tengas las respuestas y no te interese buscarlas por mí. Me parece lógico. Arranco a investigar sobre el consenso científico: https://t.co/haLgaZrzc9
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @tomrtwit: @mark_lynas @Farmer_Tom_UK @BBCr4today ... that's a complaint probably best directed at the 300+ scientists who say "claims…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
@mark_lynas @Farmer_Tom_UK @BBCr4today ... that's a complaint probably best directed at the 300+ scientists who say "claims of consensus on the safety of GMOs are not supported by an objective analysis of the refereed literature." https://t.co/MC8NH2r3fA
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…
RT @GMWatch: Wonder who to take more seriously? Sally Brooks, an expert on science and tech for development, who's published a book on gold…