@ClaudiaZettel Das mit dem Konsens der Wissenschaft über grüne Gentechnik stimmt halt einfach nicht. (siehe https://t.co/XOauFI7iNw) Sie erhöht u.a. die Abhängigkeit von Bayer, etc. und erhöht den Pestizideinsatz (siehe https://t.co/gLbEWSvl3g), deren Hers
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace hincapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace hincapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace hincapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace hincapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos…
También, hace hincapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos GM no han mostrado efectos adversos en la salud. En los hechos, no hay consenso científico sobre la seguridad de su consumo. ➡️6/9 ➡️
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos G…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos G…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos G…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos G…
RT @ElenaBuylla: También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos G…
También, hace incapié en la falta de sustento científico en las premisas de EEUU y Canadá, que afirman que los alimentos GM no han mostrado efectos adversos en la salud. En los hechos, no hay consenso científico sobre la seguridad de su consumo. ➡️https://
@Thor_st3n @oliver_luthi @HellwegBernhard @SAG_Gentechfrei @ENSSER_org Diese Unterschriftenliste wird regelmäßig als "peer-reviewed publication" angegeben: "...continues to be open for signature on the website of the initiating scientific organization ENSS
@AurelianoStingi @RobiVil Quella riportata è la posizione del creatore del Golden Rice. Legittima e ragionevole. Ma parziale. E non è solo Greenpeace a mettere in dubbio gli OGM. Una parte della comunità scientifica ritiene che i dati sulla sicurezza siano
"No Scientific Consensus on GMO Safety" 2015 article https://t.co/jDVDlJaQV8 #GMO #BioEngineering
In contentious topics whether 😷, 💉🥐🥩 food 🌽 #GMO there is always a rush to manufacture a consensus. An independent push back faces HUGE resistance from industry+ academia+ industry-allied- media 📰📒 + it's "influencers" amplifying📣 fake consensus https:/
"the claim that there is a consensus on safety of GMOs continues to be widely and often uncritically aired" . . . This is another area where you so easily hear claims of 'misinformation'
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
RT @TimothyAWise: A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the s…
A 2015 statement signed by more than 300 scientists insisted that there is no scientific consensus on #GMO safety: “the scientific evidence published to date prevents conclusive claims of safety, or of lack of safety, of GMOs.” @victor_suarez @ElenaBuylla
@omwambaKE
RT @job_too: @wangwesmart https://t.co/6N97vet9YQ this paper which is aptly titled " No scientific consensus on safety of GMOs" disproves w…
@254lyt @WilliamsRuto Would you read this paper https://t.co/6N97vet9YQ
@wangwesmart https://t.co/6N97vet9YQ this paper which is aptly titled " No scientific consensus on safety of GMOs" disproves what the president @WilliamsRuto told Kenyans on national Television. Is the President informed on this matter or has he also boug
RT @MightyM55070329: No Scientific Consensus On GMO Safety... https://t.co/rODDw7tRom
No Scientific Consensus On GMO Safety... https://t.co/rODDw7tRom
@bayoz7 @rodgers_kirwa @SokoAnalyst @Rita_Oyier I'm not Kenyan but can't help noting that many scientists dispute any claims that there's a consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/vn4cDi8HsN Indeed, the pioneering GM food scientist @bmartineau_ describes suc
@Damkyan_Omega @UnMondeRiant Euh alors c'est faux https://t.co/CjtcJSVchR
@ReOpen911_info @AtheeIV @Malek94Rayan @amelie_for_you Le seul papier pseudo scientifique qui remet en cause le consensus est avec cette gourou, j'en ai pas vu d'autre. S'il y en a, il faut partagé au lieu de laisser faire le taff au autre. 1/2 https://t.
We hope the FDA is coming out soon with the regulations on the MANDATORY LABELLING of GM foods! There is "No scientific consensus on GMO safety" https://t.co/SVrSZi5wlV
RT @SchillerWalther: @Synsei1 @cohaerentiaT @sandrousseau "In the scope of this document, we can only highlight a few examples to illustrat…
@Synsei1 @cohaerentiaT @sandrousseau "In the scope of this document, we can only highlight a few examples to illustrate that the totality of scientific research outcomes in the field of GM crop safety is nuanced; complex; often contradictory or inconclusiv
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @StacyMalkan: @Sarah_Evanega @Cornell @ScienceAlly @gatesfoundation 300 researchers say there is "concerted effort by GM seed developers…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @StacyMalkan: @Sarah_Evanega @Cornell @ScienceAlly @gatesfoundation 300 researchers say there is "concerted effort by GM seed developers…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
RT @kevinfolta: A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A…
A handful of folks declare that there is "no consensus" on transgenic crop safety. A consensus is not something declared. A consensus is the synthesis of decades of research, which to date shows no evidence of harm from transgenic crops. That's remarkable
RT @StacyMalkan: @Sarah_Evanega @Cornell @ScienceAlly @gatesfoundation 300 researchers say there is "concerted effort by GM seed developers…
RT @StacyMalkan: @Sarah_Evanega @Cornell @ScienceAlly @gatesfoundation 300 researchers say there is "concerted effort by GM seed developers…
@Sarah_Evanega @Cornell @ScienceAlly @gatesfoundation 300 researchers say there is "concerted effort by GM seed developers and some scientists...to construct claims that there is a ‘scientific consensus’ on #GMO safety and that the debate on this topic is
Otro clarísimo aporte al presunto conflicto entre los transgénicos y la salud humana @ASASemilleros @hhdospierre @matiaslongoni @javierlanari @inaseargentina @bertellof @cgmira @AlfredoPaseyro @NideraSemillas @CortevaARG @Bayer4CropsAR @bioceressemilla
@LudwigWenke But there ARE a few studies suggesting there are dangers when 100% GM diets are involved. The "safe - consensus" is largely illusory - https://t.co/OOiOD2sd4E
@CesarPachonAgro https://t.co/rVXkQBJHSu Defender la seguridad y soberanía alimentaria es un tema muy importante que no se puede dejar a la deriva. @duvandanza @usbcartagena @USBCali @USBmed @usbbog @ColVirreySolis @DiaconoOikos @Colgemelli @episcopadocol
https://t.co/rVXkQBJHSu Lo que dice la comunidad científica acerca de los OGM.
De acuerdo! Me parece importante que se abra la discusión.Una semilla transgénica es un clon. En cambio las plagas que los depredan sí tienen diversidad genética. Las toxinas pueden ser efectivas contra algunos miembros de la población pero algunos individ
@FlavienConscien Pour savoir s'il y a un consensus, il faut comparer la liste des experts qui pensent comme vous et la liste des sceptiques. https://t.co/hLnWn3GDl3
@stuartsmyth66 No scientific consensus on #GMO safety https://t.co/qGE4s1qgbm
@Nathanael_MD Par exemple ici : https://t.co/YePYPRemRF
Je viens de voir le conspi-dont-on-ne-doit-pas-prononcer-le nom (au risque de le voir popper et partager son pseudo-wiki complètement perché) partager ceci : https://t.co/MNwkXEYmco
@MdYueh Tu as un lien qui dit qu'il y a un consensus. Et d'autres disent qu'il n'y en a pas. Comment on fait pour savoir qui a raison ? Si t'en sais rien, tu as le droit de le dire, et on en reste là. https://t.co/GVMrk5wdNb
@MdYueh Ce n'est pas aux sceptiques de démontrer que la thèse du NIST est fausse, c'est à ceux qui la défendent de démontrer qu'elle est vraie. Si possible avec autre chose que des données classifiées. Sur les OGM, tu as l'air bien sûr de toi. https://t.co
@DEphemeria La science n'a pas encore tranché le débat, contrairement à ce que veulent faire croire certains idéologues : https://t.co/YePYPRemRF
@_Natacha_D @Kako_line @NolPaul1 @Damkyan_Omega Il n'y a pas de consensus chez les scientifiques, il est donc faux de dire que la science a tranché le débat. https://t.co/hLnWn3GDl3
@ZeteHub @YrielPenguin @achilledamu @Boumbo06 Ils sont malins, ils ne disent pas qu'ils détiennent la vérité, mais ils cherchent à discréditer ceux qui la cherchent, ce qui revient au même. Et pour les OGM, apparemment ce n'est pas si clair que ça. https:/
@JrmeSari1 La communauté scientifique ne partage pas cet avis : https://t.co/hLnWn3GDl3
@GimelloJulien Vous êtes sûr de savoir ce qu'est un consensus scientifique ? https://t.co/hLnWn3GDl3
@GeraldJtb @moravec_tomas You're out of date (by 25 yrs or so) with the science. Unexpected effects of #GMO plants, see book GMO Myths and Truths, edn 4, for many refs. Also: https://t.co/nrV4MNazmN ; https://t.co/qGE4s1qgbm ; https://t.co/2FZyfWBQXg
@miriam_ionica @iteuki @EdgarRavenswood @ElenaBuylla @CiadConacyt @UNAM_MX @Conacyt_MX Interesante manuscrito de opinión de alguien dedicada a neurociencias. Acá otra opción, tal vez más adecuada? https://t.co/R8ULnzW1qL
@FrankPangallo there is no consensus on #GMO safety: https://t.co/coi5buYYoG
@berghberghbergh @Partiet Akkurat det er det vel ikke vitenskapelig enighet om (se feks https://t.co/B7tprE9leB)
@0scarTG @sergio78530193 @ElenaBuylla @elhombredelsol La ciencia no se hace por creencia sino por evidencia. Sí, aunque tengan el Nobel de literatura 😂😂😂 Aquí científicos que sustentan con argumentos el por qué no hay un consenso https://t.co/R8ULnzW1qL
@ADNDaniel @Conacyt_MX Cuando desde el primer párrafo de un escrito ya existe pretensión de engaño sobre el falso consenso sobre #OGM, qué puede esperarse del resto? Por más marketing que se haga, NO hay consenso científico respecto a la seguridad de los t
@prometheusgreen @moravec_tomas @Bowenchris @US_FDA The only consensus on #GMO safety is among GM crop developers who have no expertise in toxicology or risk assessment: https://t.co/9jIX5EaYnt
@EmmmanuelS Google est ton ami. Voici un exemple: https://t.co/FslllZAeXE
RT @sbrnnafisa: @TomahawkVPhD @esulle46 @richiembunda @MVIWATA Please, there is no scientific consensus on the safety of GMOs, plus what is…
@TomahawkVPhD @esulle46 @richiembunda @MVIWATA Please, there is no scientific consensus on the safety of GMOs, plus what is also lacking is independent scientific studies https://t.co/ldb9UhDLx8
@Science_Academy @Greens Report authored by GM crop scientists with serious conflicts of interest concludes GM crops are safe. We would really hope for more balance from the @Science_Academy - meanwhile the peer reviewed literature concludes there is no co
@Science_Academy That is not what the peer reviewed literature says: https://t.co/9jIX5DTmYT
@LaraLandX @Olivefarmer @Smartmo20613684 @jacktame @NZQandA @royalsocietynz Oh really?! I have a BSc in Biology and MSc in Biodiversity and Conservation and know that they don't. Maybe that extra year made all the difference...: https://t.co/UMtvNha9ez
@FredrikDehlin @roslagstos @kajsadovstad @YttraYttra2 >>>Påståendet om ett vetenskapligt konsensus kring GMO:s ofarlighet är för övrigt osant: https://t.co/ClWmIobJNv