| Title |
No scientific consensus on GMO safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1 |
| Authors |
Angelika Hilbeck, Rosa Binimelis, Nicolas Defarge, Ricarda Steinbrecher, András Székács, Fern Wickson, Michael Antoniou, Philip L Bereano, Ethel Ann Clark, Michael Hansen, Eva Novotny, Jack Heinemann, Hartmut Meyer, Vandana Shiva, Brian Wynne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 458 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 85 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 6% |
| Canada | 24 | 5% |
| India | 14 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Unknown | 215 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 397 | 87% |
| Scientists | 29 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 457 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 119 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 13% |
| Researcher | 60 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 102 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 25% |
| Unknown | 113 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 865. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,049
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#4
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164
of 361,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them