The Reps higher than I'd expect for 80%, as you pointed this out in prior post @MashElite ! Here evidene supports high fixed loads push "strength & RFD changes seem to be load-dependent" in favor of an improved shift to the right. @StrengthDebates htt
RT @Jozo_Grgic: Impact of high versus low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development…
RT @Jozo_Grgic: Impact of high versus low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development…
Impact of high versus low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development https://t.co/8VJbmZ1t6j
@eihtbeezy Yep. It's all about training close to failure. It just takes lighter weights longer to reach that threshold, but both heavy and light weights can lead to an increase in muscle mass. https://t.co/K4NGYm2Tb8
@BenShannonPT @UKSCA Have a read of the background section on this paper which shows how long (8 weeks) for increases in CSA (hypertrophy), strength and endurance: https://t.co/gXXwS4KzhY
When building strength and hypertrophy, does the amount of load and specific rep ranges really matter? Low load to fatigue may be enough (although strength gains are arguably higher in high load resistance training): https://t.co/CkwQ6t626E https://t.co/g
More & more #research points to #training to failure rather than rep-range or load for #hypertrophy: "Impact of high vs. low fixed loads & non-linear training loads on #muscle hypertrophy, strength & force development" https://t.co/rHICDztX6o
RT @Nutrientrena: Llevados al fallo,↑carga (80% RM) o ↓carga (30% RM)=hipertrofia aunq>fuerza el 1º;un protocolo mixto no es mejor https:/…
RT @Nutrientrena: Llevados al fallo,↑carga (80% RM) o ↓carga (30% RM)=hipertrofia aunq>fuerza el 1º;un protocolo mixto no es mejor https:/…
Llevados al fallo,↑carga (80% RM) o ↓carga (30% RM)=hipertrofia aunq>fuerza el 1º;un protocolo mixto no es mejor https://t.co/hBhNHdv2lL
Fink et al. 2016 🤔 https://t.co/4IdTVhJgxu https://t.co/wLvoZLx4ek https://t.co/YpGIBs2ARe
Good study! Impact of high vs low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy. 2016 https://t.co/4IdTVhJgxu https://t.co/H0d1tpL3Yd
RT @FitGreyStrong: Strength & RFD changes seem to be load-dependent & were not enhanced by non-linear periodisation https://t.co/ovudXNWVM9…
Strength & RFD changes seem to be load-dependent & were not enhanced by non-linear periodisation https://t.co/ovudXNWVM9 #exercise
Provided resistive #exercise is done to failure, muscle hypertrophy appears similar irrespective of training load https://t.co/ovudXNWVM9
Impact of high vs low fixed loads & non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength & force development https://t.co/ovudXNWVM9
https://t.co/9j4zivZ1b0 More evidence of the 80% threshold in resistance training
Impact of high vs low fixed loads & non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength & force development https://t.co/Rw0lpSdI5U
Training load might not affect muscle hypertrophy, as long as you reach failure... https://t.co/rmHH2HmOfY
Impact of high versus low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force https://t.co/wYrym7MKZS
RT @JamesSteeleII: Impact of high vs low fixed and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development https://…
Impact of high vs low fixed and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development https://t.co/3YNYNsYLjw
RT @dnewmire: Another RT until failure argument supporting volume is a greater factor than intensity. https://t.co/vnsvRh437M
RT @dnewmire: Another RT until failure argument supporting volume is a greater factor than intensity. https://t.co/vnsvRh437M
Another RT until failure argument supporting volume is a greater factor than intensity. https://t.co/vnsvRh437M