@RWMaloneMD Shi Zhengli's Wuhan team quickly investigated in 2012, but did not publish any results until February 2016. https://t.co/u69jhi6QM8
A related paper published in 2016 https://t.co/xsTZvH9l1x
RT @Rossana38510044: @stuartjdneil @mrandersoninneo @MonaRahalkar @TheSeeker268 @_hoeman Absolutely, the missing reference makes the whole…
However, like Baric, Shi has a credibility problem in that her virus didn’t exist prior to 2020 outside of a short sequence published as RaBtCoV/4991 in 2016. 17/n https://t.co/oDgr6W0GmC
@SenJoniErnst Long 🧵 about US Taxpayer money & Wuhan coronavirus research #SubpoenaDaszak👇 https://t.co/jmXz5ELc72
@ScienceMagazine @SpyrosLytras @robertson_lab 🧵 about #RaTG13 & NIH grant:R01AI110964 & #SubpoenaDaszak 👇 https://t.co/jmXz5ELc72
@Drinkwater5Reed @franciscodeasis @babarlelephant @ChuckPaulen @TheSeeker268 @sanqia @Daoyu15 @AntGDuarte @Ayjchan For the 2015 photo, we have 2/6 with Zhang Yunzhi , Zhou Jihua. This paper lists more people that had sampled at the mine. https://t.co/dp5Yf
RT @schnufi666: @KhaledATalaat @PeterDaszak In the online version of the study "Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat coloni…
RT @ydeigin: @blindside1973 @alimhaider @Baric_Lab It is possible Shi Zhengli’s group sequenced the spike genes in 2016 but decided to keep…
2016-ZL https://t.co/CcbUNIe6kh
RT @ydeigin: I am referring to this 2016 paper: https://t.co/lK0p9onHj0
RT @Ayjchan: How do we make sense of this? A novel SARS virus, connected to unresolved SARS-like cases in 2012, was buried in a 2016 Virolo…
https://t.co/fFan2pjFDp VIROLOGICA SINICA 2016, 31 (1): 31–40DOI: 10.1007/s12250-016-3713-9RESEARCH ARTICLECoexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies inan abandoned mineshaftXing-Yi Ge1#, Ning Wang1#, Wei Zhang1, Ben Hu1, Bei Li1, Yun-Z
15/Y And a DRASTIC member is *still* trying to make misleading insinuations using RaTG13. Man facepalming https://t.co/zBsNfMdmfJ https://t.co/WEdMJqjrpa Excellent video from Potholer54 related to this: from 5:51 to 7:41 https://t.co/6YVuykMJNW https:/
@zhihuachen @jfjulien @SebViret @AtomsksSanakan @emmecola @FdsMaximus @FrancescoEsp33 @Wezuwezu @Rossana38510044 @stuartjdneil No worries folks, it’s just "a new strain of this virus lineage" . Nothing to see here. Move along. https://t.co/OdbWFHWYlx http
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @FrancescoEsp33 @stuartjdneil @FdsMaximus @Wezuwezu @Rossana38510044 Let me know when you finally decide to do your hom…
@FrancescoEsp33 @stuartjdneil @FdsMaximus @Wezuwezu @Rossana38510044 Let me know when you finally decide to do your homework on a topic you clearly lack expertise in, and finally decide to display something integrity. Start with this paper, for example:
@rolland1871 @DeViL3O3 @ReusVisser @WSJ Its partial genome was published in 2016 under a different name. https://t.co/o7fpe6xGIK
RT @ydeigin: I am referring to this 2016 paper: https://t.co/lK0p9onHj0
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 10/Y Particularly interesting is how conspiracists emphasize researchers looking at coronaviruses in the mine: https:/…
@FrancescoEsp33 @Wezuwezu @Rossana38510044 @stuartjdneil Re: "I was joking with Rossana on Shi's declaration of a fungal infection to cover-up the probable sars-related origin of the illness." Stop being disingenuous, for once. https://t.co/M0scCoC1pf h
10/Y Particularly interesting is how conspiracists emphasize researchers looking at coronaviruses in the mine: https://t.co/GzflDIYLH3 Yet the conspiracists don't emphasize researchers looking at other pathogens in the mine. I wonder why...🤔 https://t.
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
@zeynep Whereas in Shi team’s paper in Virological Sinica 2016, in English, they wrote “In this study, we conducted a two- year RT-PCR surveillance of bat coronaviruses in an abandoned mineshaft in Mojiang County, Yunnan Province, China.” https://t.co/ECc
@sudonhim @RichardHanania Regarding RaTG13, he just repeats the outdated skepticism that WIV was working on it. But as of now we know they were specifically working on it. They published articles on it starting 2016: https://t.co/ATFbdSVpaU
@Aceofspades256 @stgoldst But they claimed they lost 4991. Then they claimed they never sequenced it. Then it came out that they were recently working with it. A web of lies. One after the other after the other. Normal though right? https://t.co/UNFm2cdMUr
RT @franciscodeasis: For Apr-2013 there should be 52 samples from Jinning (Hu et al., 2017) and around 52 from TG. Although Ge et al. (2016…
RT @franciscodeasis: For Apr-2013 there should be 52 samples from Jinning (Hu et al., 2017) and around 52 from TG. Although Ge et al. (2016…
RT @franciscodeasis: For Apr-2013 there should be 52 samples from Jinning (Hu et al., 2017) and around 52 from TG. Although Ge et al. (2016…
For Apr-2013 there should be 52 samples from Jinning (Hu et al., 2017) and around 52 from TG. Although Ge et al. (2016) mentioned “bat fecal swabs” from the mine, Wang (2014) mentioned “mainly bat anal swab and pharyngeal swab” for the first 2 trips. https
@JoshRosenau @Rossana38510044 @Michael_RA @lab_leak @TheSeeker268 Xu’s master thesis has what to do with the name? How about Shi’s paper in 2016 calling it 4991? Go ahead and blather more about how science works, maybe someone will believe you. https://t.c
RT @zhihuachen: The WIV team didn’t mention the miner deaths in their 2016 paper either. So this practice predates the pandemic. https://t.…
The WIV team didn’t mention the miner deaths in their 2016 paper either. So this practice predates the pandemic. https://t.co/7eRfXhJmpw
RT @ZhouLabUCR: 15/ It's understandable for NIH to ask questions related to RaTG13. After all, the first paper (https://t.co/lbwtPwME5f; #3…
Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft. Conducted a surveillance of coronaviruses in bats in an abandoned mineshaft in Mojiang County, Yunnan Province, China, from 2012-2013. (2016) https://t.co/aM18jtMhl
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
Interestingly, the Mojiang mine was mentioned in the @sciam piece, but not when talking about RaTG13, while it was known that RaTG13 = Ge et al.'s RaBtCoV/4991▪️9/ https://t.co/qCjX6JBjHa https://t.co/yIfMP40qdX
RaTG13's partial RdRp sequence had been published in a previous study (Ge et al. 2016) ▪️7/ https://t.co/OFFrbpEmy9 https://t.co/fJp0oqq0t2
@FrancoisOuell15 Pardon...the paper was published in Feb 2016. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny
@jimgeraghty People have known about this for years. This is what originally prompted the research. https://t.co/kd8xxr0X81
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @ch_zimmer: Nice! https://t.co/sbJNDIRVwy
Nice!
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
Dont read this. https://t.co/MC1Fgg8UjN
@Jkylebass It all started in 2013. We conducted a surveillance of coronaviruses in bats in an abandoned mineshaft in Mojiang County, Yunnan Province, China, from 2012–2013 https://t.co/kd8xxr0X81
@TheSeeker268 @franciscodeasis They knew before they published this and chose deception and obfuscation. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny https://t.co/7p1k4WUpm0
@FrancoisOuell15 @evolving_string Start here. Then read the Nov 2020 addendum (which she was obliged to do) where she suddenly discloses they found 8 more sl-covs never mentioned. It is deception...intentional deception. https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny
RT @Dr_Al911: The original paper describing the discovery of #RaTG13 (the bat coronavirus most closely related to #SARSCoV2) from a Mojia…
RT @jhouse678: @TheSeeker268 This species doesn’t even appear in their Feb 2016 paper... https://t.co/lDZ6Gyo5ny https://t.co/vhMokS2TJH
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @akamber: https://t.co/2BT9x0dgNw @Roarmedia4 we'll be discussing this week's highlights with @AlexisBadenMaye https://t.co/UZZhokT7mI
RT @akamber: https://t.co/2BT9x0dgNw @Roarmedia4 we'll be discussing this week's highlights with @AlexisBadenMaye https://t.co/UZZhokT7mI
https://t.co/2BT9x0dgNw @Roarmedia4 we'll be discussing this week's highlights with @AlexisBadenMaye
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…