2016 publication documenting a two year surveillance of bat CoVs from the Mojian mine https://t.co/9HIolgpPTB
Beijing, other was Wuhan Institute for Virology (WIV). Beijing swabbed 3 species, reported new Henipa (Nipah-like) virus; no coronaviruses. WIV (2016) reported finding coronaviruses same cave; cited 2014 paper but don't hint anyone had got sick there. http
After sampling the cave for a year, the researchers discovered a diverse group of coronaviruses in six bat species. 2/18/16 Published https://t.co/UVQdmnOorT https://t.co/S9I8PVtgp0
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
@justme_hoping @mattwridley going back further to 2012 Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft Xing-Yi Ge,Wang, Zhang, Ben Hu, Bei Li, Zhang, Ji-Hua Zhou, Luo, Xing-Lou Yang, Wu, Wang, Yun Zhang, Zong-Xiao
RT @ampuero001: Lol WIV is basing their whole defense of RaTG13 on ONE BAT SAMPLE ! All they reported they could extract of RaTG13 from Rhi…
RT @tommy_cleary: @McWLuke @PeterDaszak @WHO @SciDiplomacyUSA @sciencecohen @MarionKoopmans @wcgIRB @BangXiao_ @sciencecohen insightful inv…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @lolococo2018: 又打脸闫立梦,莫江矿洞病毒 根本就是认为制造的阴谋论,在数据中找出来的当时的公开报道,病毒完全被采样和提取序列,没什么神秘的。
又打脸闫立梦,莫江矿洞病毒 根本就是认为制造的阴谋论,在数据中找出来的当时的公开报道,病毒完全被采样和提取序列,没什么神秘的。
RT @toxenv: todo bien si se hubieran limitado a estudiar presencia de coronavirus, realizar estudio genomico y entender capacidad bats de r…
todo bien si se hubieran limitado a estudiar presencia de coronavirus, realizar estudio genomico y entender capacidad bats de resistencia a ser portadores. Desde q Wuhan lab se dedico a estudiar su pasaje por celus humanas con guita fauci/collins comenzo l
@toxenv Public debe 2016 Autores Xing-Yi Ge 1, NingWang 1, wei zhang , ben-hu , bei li , Yun-Zhi Zhang , Ji Hua Zhou , Chu Ming Luo , Xing Lou Yang , Li Jun Wu , bo wang , yun zhang , Zong-Xiao Li , Zheng Li Shi https://t.co/AtFWkKBrrZ
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
#LetsGoBrandon #FireFauci Too much information, relating to the WIH and the US Gov.
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Saint__Michel: 闫丽梦博士在第二份科学报告中提到的云南省墨江县通关镇矿洞蝙蝠学术文章,由WIV石正丽团队撰写,2016年2月18日发表。 学术论文网址:(可下载PDF) https://t.co/vdcimwzvqW https://t.co/ktUlJt…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
RT @stevenemassey: 16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a…
RT @stevenemassey: 5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affin…
16/ If the RaTG13 sequence was generated from Rhinolophus sp. tissue, it is hard to explain how it made the leap from a fecal swab where it was first detected in 👇 https://t.co/ooOlGXmssO
5/ In addition, RaTG13 (then termed RaBtCov/4991) was described by Zhengli Shi as being originally detected in a R.affinis fecal swab from the mine in Mojiang using PCR of the RdRp gene https://t.co/ooOlGXmssO
Link to the 2016 RaTG13 Shi article on the NIH website, the Publication type section: https://t.co/FW5zN1TY6t Link to The Intercept FOIA file. Page 495: https://t.co/eVxUxV66kK Rest of the links are above in thread.
@DrAndyTsun Grantome isn’t an official website. And the articles are not on their list of publications funded by NIAID either. Read my 2nd and 4th tweets. Here another NIH link. At Publication type it clearly says Non US-Gov’t! But Shi Zhengli and Daszak
@Florin_Uncovers Thanks for the R01AI110964 link. I'm trying to understand why this paper isn't in that grant list? Some sort of query error or data match problem, maybe on the project number? https://t.co/XOVqHHnH19
@beyerstein likely the fecal swab, reported in https://t.co/dJ8qlpqYj7 as this is where RaTG13 was first detected (then termed 'RaBtCov/4991')
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @tommy_cleary: @McWLuke @PeterDaszak @WHO @SciDiplomacyUSA @sciencecohen @MarionKoopmans @wcgIRB @BangXiao_ @sciencecohen insightful inv…
RT @stevenemassey: 4/ A copper mine in Mojiang, Yunnan was where RaTG13 (then labelled RaBtCov/4991) was originally sampled, described in t…
RT @stevenemassey: 4/ A copper mine in Mojiang, Yunnan was where RaTG13 (then labelled RaBtCov/4991) was originally sampled, described in t…
@stuartjdneil @jfjulien @BillyBostickson that is consistent with the data in Table 4. The details of their extraction procedure was extremely sparse 👇 https://t.co/dJ8qlpqYj7
4/ A copper mine in Mojiang, Yunnan was where RaTG13 (then labelled RaBtCov/4991) was originally sampled, described in the article below by Zheng-li Shi h/t @Rossana38510044 @TheSeeker268 @MonaRahalkar https://t.co/ooOlGXmssO
@IrmaArs21 Прямые ссылки на литературу: https://t.co/qDHoBu5hdP https://t.co/jRlnWNevdC
I am further unaware of any evidence that lists horseshoe bats (likely R. affinis) as the identified source of SARS1. Shi Zhengli et al's 2016 study seems to be referenced here, but it does not make that conclusion. https://t.co/u69jhi6QM8
@TheSeeker268 Only 5000 people have ever looked at the above paper & possibly no-one except me has linked it to this paper of the 2012 & 2013 Tong Guan Copper cave mines of HKU10 virus breaking through to a possible beta (human) 🦠 virus. h
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
RT @Dr_Al911: Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpay…
Long 🧵 about Daszak's NIH grant R01AI110964, the link to WIV research & his efforts to hide these from US congress and taxpayers 👇 #SubpoenaDaszak https://t.co/jmXz5ELc72
@TheSeeker268 @zhihuachen @robertson_lab @stuartjdneil @mrandersoninneo @AntGDuarte @Rossana38510044 @ChuckPaulen @kengann101 @AngloScot2 @_everythingism @Stephengm99 @nicolascgrey @MonaRahalkar Did you find how the CDC network work? Wuhan CDC and Hubei CD
The first time was in 2016 - RaBtCov/4991. https://t.co/dp5YfMnJ2R https://t.co/1Mbg27UviW
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 This is a fantastic thread.
RT @Dr_Al911: The study identifying #RaTG13 was partially supported by NIH grant:R01AI110964 (https://t.co/ftRoDlBpB1). US taxpayers' money…
RT @tommy_cleary: @DaveAtkinsonMD @pathogenetics @EricTopol @institutpasteur @edwardcholmes Virus hunting is hard & methodology to recover…
@DaveAtkinsonMD @pathogenetics @EricTopol @institutpasteur @edwardcholmes Virus hunting is hard & methodology to recover SL CoV borders chimeric anyways, so making nSL CoV in lab is pragmatic, no? How is evidence WIV has place chimera virus into litera
@tim24free Here are several other examples of bats causing viruses in humans. Funny how a conspiracy stops being a conspiracy when you learn about a topic. RaTG13 https://t.co/CgIud4MNE9 In 2014 https://t.co/Tp35vDZF0K Multiple coronaviruses found in bats
#drastic 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@MonaRahalkar @stuartjdneil @Rossana38510044 @past_is_future @JanKlimkowski @Tantalite @mrandersoninneo @Ayjchan @DaveAtkinsonMD @MJnanostretch @EtaitLife @ydeigin @Daoyu15 @pathogenetics @radical_libere @shingheizhan "Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses
@R_H_Ebright @TheSeeker268 Referring to these two now-famous papers, of course: https://t.co/piAgUt0Hbk https://t.co/y39CBW4bvs
RT @tommy_cleary: @TheSeeker268 @janisfrayer Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft https…
RT @tommy_cleary: @AnagalisArvensi @Ayjchan @Christopher_W_G @WHO @wto @TheSeeker268 So Nov 2019 was not when the nCoV was found in the pop…
@AnagalisArvensi @Ayjchan @Christopher_W_G @WHO @wto @TheSeeker268 So Nov 2019 was not when the nCoV was found in the population, but it was when certain people in PRC were allowed to know it was in the population... https://t.co/eBkt4mZhW2
@Ayjchan It is striking that the Beijing researchers (Wu et al 2014) refer to the pneumonia cases, but the WIV researchers (Ge et al 2016) do not. Both Beijing and WIV researchers were sampling in the Mojiang mine in 2012-2013. https://t.co/Y5LbYg4I14 http