↓ Skip to main content

Diet Quality and Weight Change in Adults Over Time: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 109)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Diet Quality and Weight Change in Adults Over Time: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13668-014-0115-1
Authors

Haya Aljadani, Amanda Patterson, David Sibbritt, Clare E. Collins

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#186,493
of 8,028,230 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#4
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,938
of 334,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,028,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them