@marcfbellemare @dlmillimet What a cool paper! I’m annoyed at myself for not being aware of it. Here’s one highlighting construct validity on similar issues: https://t.co/s75txcCQwZ
RT @DaveBrady72: This looks like an interesting paper. Fwiw, I’d question the framing of dearth of measures of lifetime economic resources.…
RT @DaveBrady72: This looks like an interesting paper. Fwiw, I’d question the framing of dearth of measures of lifetime economic resources.…
This looks like an interesting paper. Fwiw, I’d question the framing of dearth of measures of lifetime economic resources. See e.g. work by @sakamoto_arthur & @ChangHwan_Kim86 as well as our paper here: https://t.co/s75txcCQwZ We do all seem to have
@Tiffany_L_Green For instance, @sakamoto_arthur & colleagues have shown convincingly that current earnings far outperform any occupation-based measure as proxy for permanent earnings. We also show current income is far superior for proxying perm income
@mjantti @JaniErola @BerkayOzcan_ Here it is: https://t.co/s75txcTTyZ
(jei] https://t.co/7mk1Qd9QO9 to measure and proxy permanent income: evidence from Germany and the U.S. Abstract Permanent income (PI) is an enduring concept in the social sciences and is highly relevant to the study of inequality. Nevertheless, there… h