↓ Skip to main content

How to measure and proxy permanent income: evidence from Germany and the U.S.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economic Inequality, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
How to measure and proxy permanent income: evidence from Germany and the U.S.
Published in
Journal of Economic Inequality, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10888-017-9363-9
Authors

David Brady, Marco Giesselmann, Ulrich Kohler, Anke Radenacker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,375,204
of 13,366,039 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Inequality
#113
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,532
of 266,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Inequality
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,366,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.