RT @NikolovScience: @NeatCraftsmen @Michael15297558 I know Holmes's work and the video you posted above. He adopted some of our terminology…
RT @NikolovScience: @NeatCraftsmen @Michael15297558 I know Holmes's work and the video you posted above. He adopted some of our terminology…
@NeatCraftsmen @Michael15297558 I know Holmes's work and the video you posted above. He adopted some of our terminology such as Atmospheric Thermal Enhancement, which we introduced in our 2014 paper (https://t.co/tz4NKfZke6), but he applied the Gas Law inc
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
@Axtonian @velolink @Ericson_ubbhult @beckmansasikter -Om man inte vet men tror så är det rimligt att uttrycka sig så. -Bilden är utdrag från dessa båda rapporter. https://t.co/ATaVFBDZcX
@robbystarbuck
RT @DrCapitalP: @dajsel @Ericson_ubbhult @Nebbiolo71 @StefanSvennson @Bosse5050 @ToreK För den som vill grotta ner sig ytterligare, finns ä…
@dajsel @Ericson_ubbhult @Nebbiolo71 @StefanSvennson @Bosse5050 @ToreK För den som vill grotta ner sig ytterligare, finns även denna utmärkta peer review-studie. On the average temperature of airless spherical bodies and the magnitude of Earth’s atmospher
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
@SnookOlMan @tan123 @TheTweetOfGod Examine this paper https://t.co/SLNV9rBbIQ
@KarlErbach I read this https://t.co/SLNV9rBbIQ At the very least the difference being greater than 33 degrees C is demonstrated. Not sure about some of the details eg the gravity of moon versus the earth for example.
@GavinNewsom @CAgovernor of you credibility. There is no AGW Have some of you people read this https://t.co/SLNV9rBbIQ
@tan123 I have read this ? https://t.co/SLNV9rBbIQ This is a real killer of the AGW stuff. I am not sure of everything and am still reviewing it.
@turpinator929 Have you reviewed this calculation ? https://t.co/SLNV9rjARi
@jgorman2424 Here is the @NikolovScience agrument. https://t.co/SLNV9rBbIQ Holder's Inequality of linear integrals.
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @AgoizS: Falacia climática. Datos NASA: las variaciones en la temperatura terrestre se deben a un continuo termodinámico cósmico que se…
RT @AgoizS: Falacia climática. Datos NASA: las variaciones en la temperatura terrestre se deben a un continuo termodinámico cósmico que se…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @metakosmisk: Det handlar inte om CO2, det är mängden atmosfär som huvudsakligen avgör planettemperaturen.
RT @metakosmisk: Det handlar inte om CO2, det är mängden atmosfär som huvudsakligen avgör planettemperaturen. https://t.co/NfNXifHAuO
Det handlar inte om CO2, det är mängden atmosfär som huvudsakligen avgör planettemperaturen.
Don’t fall for the climate scam
@sotonohit その必要は皆無です。 既に立派な論文を他の科学者が書いていますから。 On the average temperature of airless spherical bodies and the magnitude of Earth’s atmospheric thermal effect Den Volokincorresponding author and Lark ReLlez https://t.co/W2gyByF8CX
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
RT @NikolovScience: This is a layman's summary of our new #climate concept emerging from analysis of recent NASA planetary observations fro…
@sotonohit それにも関わらず、こちらの論文は信じたのですね! 中身ではなく、出版社で信じるか/決して読まないか 決めるのですね! 信者の鏡ですね! https://t.co/W2gyBynxLp
@kegasa2007 それとも、まだATEとGEとTEの関係をよく理解しておられませんか? https://t.co/DfznwOkhbV
"The Moon is Earth's airless equivalent." 等価的に、空気の存在しない地球、それは月だ! 表面温度が一様な超熱伝導体の巨大球説には無理がある