RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…
RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…
RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…
RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…
RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…
5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies": https://t.co/UIMM7w2MGB
@RHH01NJ @GovMurphy These isn’t an either / or. Tackling supply & demand at the same time is proven to make both tactics more effective. We can & are working to limit coal use. Same for mass transit. And same for working to limit extraction &
RT @SorenHave: @UlrikNymanDK @m_abs @alternativet_ @SFpolitik @uffeelbaek Se også denne forskningsartikel om hvorfor det giver mening også…
RT @SorenHave: @UlrikNymanDK @m_abs @alternativet_ @SFpolitik @uffeelbaek Se også denne forskningsartikel om hvorfor det giver mening også…
@UlrikNymanDK @m_abs @alternativet_ @SFpolitik @uffeelbaek Se også denne forskningsartikel om hvorfor det giver mening også at begrænse (olie)udbud, i stedet for kun at sætte ind overfor efterspørgsel: https://t.co/cmbWaNW5uF
RT @SorenHave: God artikel om hvordan brug af politikker til at styre udbud kan være mere effektive (både økonomisk og politisk) end ditto…
God artikel om hvordan brug af politikker til at styre udbud kan være mere effektive (både økonomisk og politisk) end ditto for efterspørgsel. Super-relevant ift diskussionen om dansk olie- og kødproduktion. https://t.co/nKvz9S3MJG via @larsjensen4204 #dk
3/ "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the political and economic case for restrictive supply-side climate policies" with @RDNS_TAI argues that policies tackling fossil fuel supply must be in the climate policy "toolkit" https://t.co/iRwdODHF3E
RT @NaomiOreskes: Another important new paper: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supp…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @NaomiOreskes: Another important new paper: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supp…
RT @NaomiOreskes: Another important new paper: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supp…
Another important new paper: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies | SpringerLink https://t.co/BvI9tEEK6V
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
@JKSteinberger @fergusgreen @harrovanasselt @SEI_Erickson @mlaz_sei @DrNoelHealy @BenFranta @khar1958 @GeoffreySupran @NaomiOreskes @ghoberg You might like this one by @fergusgreen and I https://t.co/b55ylwzuVX
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
RT @GeoffreySupran: You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed l…
You forgot "destabilize fossil fuel interests' political power and institutionalized denial and delay". Peer-reviewed literature is clear: Climate action should focus on supply as well as demand. e.g.: 1) https://t.co/UIMM7w2MGB; 2) https://t.co/LIPmnZPJTh
@mateosfo I guess my point is that, Given your apt argument that we’re falling fall short in any case, why not advocate for both and all efforts to fight cc rather than say “it’s not supply stupid, it’s demand!” https://t.co/jWSmbI5krz
Her er videnskabelige artikler om klimapolitiske virkemidler på udbudssiden #dkpol #dkgreen #dkklima https://t.co/OvDoPT8tR3 https://t.co/5F4XFuBl1P https://t.co/RG9aQWzfzh
RT @SEI_Erickson: Then *also* read instant classic "Cutting with both arms of the scissors" https://t.co/NdR6bdw522 plus visionary Sky's Li…
Hear, hear! Our take on the need for climate policy targeting fossil fuel supply https://t.co/O4qnR4FuiY . To be continued...
Then *also* read instant classic "Cutting with both arms of the scissors" https://t.co/NdR6bdw522 plus visionary Sky's Limit, @FuelOnTheFire https://t.co/zQHTH9YM6g
@SamanthaHepbur2 Most welcome. The economics of supply side climate policies are often misunderstood as are the political benefits. See https://t.co/b55ylwzuVX
@wfvcr For an overview of recent academic literature on supply-side restriction as a climate change mitigation poicy, see https://t.co/fDy6X6xWtJ with an explainer here: https://t.co/J0I91UzLMh
@KateAronoff I've also recently written on "Anti-Fossil Fuel Norms" the economic and political case for policies tackling fossil fuel supply: https://t.co/76IdM1eHC5 https://t.co/esezdPiZOH
RT @Klimaatzuster: @JustinTrudeau O no! In the Netherlands Ben is famous because of his motto: "I pump it, because people want it". I know…
@JustinTrudeau O no! In the Netherlands Ben is famous because of his motto: "I pump it, because people want it". I know a lot of nice Dutch people who can really help to #actOnClimate. Like @lightyear_cars. #wedonthavetime #1point5degrees #leaveitinthegrou
RT @Klimaatzuster: @JustinTrudeau @Shell Ah Ben van B. @Shell_Nederland 'pump-it, just pump it, people want it', went to see 'leave-fossil…
@JustinTrudeau @Shell Ah Ben van B. @Shell_Nederland 'pump-it, just pump it, people want it', went to see 'leave-fossil-fuels-in-the-ground' - @JustinTrudeau... Hope Trudeau knew about Ben's motto... #406ppm #co2 #leaveitintheground #cop21 #wedonthavetime
That's not how markets work - they are formed by the intersection of supply and demand. Unilateral changes to one induces a response from the other, diminishing the effect. You need to cut with both arms of the scissors. https://t.co/bYUN0kLdvP
@mlynndonahue @JerryBrownGov Hear hear! As they say, when it comes to getting off fossil fuels, we need to cut with both arms of the scissors. (https://t.co/VRBuyDKzTi)
@Peters_Glen Renewables are not sufficient because we need supply-side FF restrictions: #ExtractionTax #BorderCarbonAdjustments #KeepItInTheGround https://t.co/07yJM81MnB We can't count on carbon removal at scale: https://t.co/vivgWq5vE3
@graniterad @PaulEDawson Do you have a specific objection? Do you prefer one of the other policy quadrants and if so why? https://t.co/07yJM81MnB What is extracted will be burned and emitted, so an #ExtractionTax seems simpler than emissions caps to #Ke
@tomrand RSS would seem to eliminate the effectiveness of the "it's a government cash grab" talking points that seems to be one of the only arguments against a CT. You've read this paper I assume? https://t.co/kBxzAcu67t
RT @fergusgreen: Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https…
Restrictive Supply Side #fossilfuels by @RDNS_TAI #StopAdani https://t.co/fhRmiXwEMJ
RT @fergusgreen: Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https…
RT @fergusgreen: Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https…
RT @fergusgreen: Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https…
RT @fergusgreen: Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https…
Irish Parliament passes bill to divest its sovereign wealth fund from all #FossilFuels! https://t.co/L2t8Z53AOu See https://t.co/esezdPiZOH on the case for policies tackling fossil fuel supply & https://t.co/X2HHe7BbaE on the logic of fossil fuel bans
For those interested in the political feasibility of #ClimateChange and building arguments to #KeepItInTheGround, check out this new paper by @fergusgreen and @RDNS_TAI https://t.co/4g5KB6z1v6
@politicalham @envirodefence @softgrasswalker Not sure I understand your logic, which seems to be, demand side efforts not working, so supply side measures won't work either. Regardless, my view is need more of both. Or, for some theory, see. e.g. https:/
RT @aureliensaussay: La politique climatique est focalisée sur la réduction de la demande d'énergie mais devrait cibler aussi la réduction…
RT @aureliensaussay: La politique climatique est focalisée sur la réduction de la demande d'énergie mais devrait cibler aussi la réduction…
La politique climatique est focalisée sur la réduction de la demande d'énergie mais devrait cibler aussi la réduction forcée de l'offre fossile : The case for restrictive supply side climate policy, @fergusgreen & @RDNS_TAI https://t.co/jGfD7No7H3
Cutting off fossil fuel supply has unique economic benefits https://t.co/hKSA2TESte
More food for thought: https://t.co/bYUN0kLdvP https://t.co/ZhI90CEU5l
@Graham_Caswell @JKSteinberger @citizensclimate @TheCLCouncil @SforCD Also, I think without supply-side measures we will not get there! should be coupled with rebates and socio-ecological tax reform. https://t.co/9gWRUj3R8E
Some great support for supply-side climate policy. We can't just make alternative energy more appealing, convenient, and cheap - it needs to be less convenient and profitable to use fossil fuels. https://t.co/xttdtVjFWB
Excellent global citizenship & altruistic choice! https://t.co/Z2igMmAtlm
@markkuilmari They read this paper from Green&Dennis (2018) and decided to act? https://t.co/FXEa1TvnKu
"[...]quadrant 1’s absence in climate discussions is, the authors say, “anomalous.” And they argue that it is impoverishing the discussion, because restrictive supply-side policies have unique economic and political benefits." (Vox) peer-reviewed paper: ht
At the least we need to stop opening more! https://t.co/vlz6q5Qp2T
The realities of economics and policy required use of restrictions for both supply & demand - and we must do so aggressively. More reading: https://t.co/sYiB4eOJhQ https://t.co/NctDeda0Ei
RT @RusselNorman: If you're looking for a slightly more in depth analysis of why we need both demand side (eg ETS) and supply side (eg ban…
RT @RusselNorman: If you're looking for a slightly more in depth analysis of why we need both demand side (eg ETS) and supply side (eg ban…
If you're looking for a slightly more in depth analysis of why we need both demand side (eg ETS) and supply side (eg ban on new oil exploration permits) climate policies this is a good read https://t.co/NTJItTklNQ
@garethmorgannz I think this is the point some of us were trying to make the other day. https://t.co/Xl5hfm8pXG
@garethmorgannz There are good economic and political reasons for introducing supply side as well as demand side climate policies (the lock-in effects of large fossil fuel investments are esp pernicious). This is useful https://t.co/NTJItTklNQ
RT @RusselNorman: @Yorrike @CubaRaglanGuy Tobacco, alcohol, CFCs, asbestos etc. supply side restrictions have been pretty successful across…
@1average_bear @acoyne @GreenpeaceCA @MikeHudema Well the Alberta government disagrees with you, they have just suggested financing/buying the whole thing. There is a very valid reason to restrict fossil fuel supplies: https://t.co/45YjDHar4e
RT @cahamelmann: Addressing #ClimateChange is a priority to achieve #SustainableDevelopment. Supply-side policy instruments targeting #Fos…
RT @cahamelmann: Addressing #ClimateChange is a priority to achieve #SustainableDevelopment. Supply-side policy instruments targeting #Fos…
Addressing #ClimateChange is a priority to achieve #SustainableDevelopment. Supply-side policy instruments targeting #FossilFuels can help achieve more effective #ClimateAction: https://t.co/EEFIQgmZu0 @fergusgreen @RDNS_TAI . https://t.co/4boBDElhjf
ICYMI: @fergusgreen & @RDNS_TAI on economic and political attributes of restrictive supply-side climate policies (eg: limiting #fossilfuel use). A very solid case for complementing demand-side measures (eg: carbon tax; cap-and-trade) in #climate strate
Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies https://t.co/HOm8CZvMcT
RT @mejacoalition: In the 40yo, peer-reviewed #ClimateChangeJournal, economists with @LSEnews & @TheAusInstitute have published evidence th…
RT @mejacoalition: In the 40yo, peer-reviewed #ClimateChangeJournal, economists with @LSEnews & @TheAusInstitute have published evidence th…
In the 40yo, peer-reviewed #ClimateChangeJournal, economists with @LSEnews & @TheAusInstitute have published evidence that restrictive supply side policies are potent & effective tools in the toolbox of climate mitigation. https://t.co/I022f2tl4w #
Boom. https://t.co/mmo27OBPjV "Restrictive supply-side policies squarely belong in the climate policy “toolkit”." https://t.co/16zknQhoVH
@smccarthy55 Absolutely, but it has been disparaged as pointless by many. The academic article https://t.co/fDy6X6Pxlh that @drvox's piece is based on shows why this is a peculiar blindspot.
@autonomeee @350_PDX Why not cut w/ both arms of scissors? Push for #KeepItInTheGround AND briskly-rising #CarbonTax w/ substantial revenue to indigenous & front line communities? https://t.co/kMAsOusiPr
#EnvironmentalJustice critique: "#CarbonTaxes could never rise high enough to challenge capital’s imperative to take all remaining #FossilFuels out of the ground." Why not cut w/ both arms of scissors? Both #KeepItInTheGround AND briskly-rising #CarbonTax?
Hooray. When you pop quickly onto twitter to tweet a really exciting (?) paper (this one: https://t.co/3R4jlnv9ZA ) on #climate and then people have written clever and helpful articles about it ... Much better! #KeepItInTheGround https://t.co/m5vwJNc20Y
New research: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies» https://t.co/xSOld7l7NH
Also HUGE thanks to the paper's authors for making their #fossilfuel study open access! https://t.co/euIsCnlyhl
@KevinClimate @Peters_Glen Kevin, Glen, curious if you've read this paper on supply-side climate policies. If we could cut demand *and* cut supply, we'd make faster progress? Or is supply-side a losing game without a global plan? Thx!! https://t.co/gzk9QNh
@NewsTalk770 @RobBreakenridge Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies 12 March 2018 https://t.co/JyA6ntWdBO
@SEI_Erickson I've been sharing this... if you've seen it, do you have an opinion on it? "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies;' https://t.co/JyA6ntWdBO
@trevortombe @jengerson Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies #ableg #bcpoli #KinderMorgan https://t.co/JyA6ntWdBO
RT @Laurie_L_L: Policies to limit #climatechange have mostly focussed on limiting demand for fossil fuels. But what about policies to limit…
Policies to limit #climatechange have mostly focussed on limiting demand for fossil fuels. But what about policies to limit their supply and to promote political awareness and drive for action? Find out in this excellent paper from @fergusgreen @RDNS_TAI
@CarbonConvoCA And here's a great new peer reviewed article that speaks to the theory and economic principles & evidence behind the effectiveness of constraints to supply as a complement to addressing demand: https://t.co/fBVMzhqN3Z
RT @RDNS_TAI: Thanks @billmckibben - i hope my article with @fergusgreen helps a lot of academics and policy makers understand the economic…
RT @BillMcKibben: Completely fascinating academic analysis showing why we have to go after both fossil fuel demand and supply. Bottom line: #KeepItInTheGround is a crucial strategy. https://t.co/4pnTUSs6v0