Next he points out that the LNP benefit from anxieties around transitioning out of coal, implying the only way to avoid this is to not argue for a need to transition. https://t.co/eHSpKK7Urt
At the same time he asserts that collective demand-side measures are the only valid strategy. Convenient when you're in the supply industry I guess but not accurate. https://t.co/eHSpKK7Urt
@Economissive I’m happy to give right of way to the economist, but I’m also hardly the first person to make this point... Cross-disciplinary mistranslation? https://t.co/1K9eAo8Tsw https://t.co/6RPoWITgME
@johnnicolay @QuentinDempster @australian Here ya go, I did some reading. This might interest you. https://t.co/eHSpKK7Urt
The magic of economics! #auspol #Morrisonsfires #AustralianFires #AUSTRALIANBUSHFIRES #ScoMoResign #ClimateChange
@tveitdal Thans for sharing. I wrote up the economic and political case for supply side policy more fully here https://t.co/b55ylwzuVX
@callyjackson @AlboMP Cheers @callyjackson . So, here's one study: https://t.co/vfbzBunLpA but I guess it's also a question of political economy ie if Australia phases out mining coal, then it will also stop participating in the institutional corruption of
@Leoparddrengen Hvis vi lige tager den seriøse hat på igen, så anbefales denne: https://t.co/PXfcDqqot1
@thoatley @bentleyballan Pertinent article on why it may be easier to build anti-fossil supply side political coalitions than consumer-side ones:'Cutting with both arms of the Scissors'. Conc harms of extraction & pollution is more salient than GHG is
@BairdTom Have you seen this paper? https://t.co/VKNzbeEadv It argues in favour of reducing demand and supply simultaneously. Their arguments seem fairly compelling! I don't think you addressed either of the 4 economic advantages they listed.
RT @gabeaschan: @LaaliMD For fair attribution, here is the citation from my slide that got cut off: https://t.co/ORnEqptAPF And here's the…
RT @gabeaschan: @LaaliMD For fair attribution, here is the citation from my slide that got cut off: https://t.co/ORnEqptAPF And here's the…
RT @gabeaschan: @LaaliMD For fair attribution, here is the citation from my slide that got cut off: https://t.co/ORnEqptAPF And here's the…
Yes. Instead of convoluted "market mechanisms" we need to simply restrict the amount of oil and gas coming into the system. This has "low administrative and transaction costs" and most importantly: higher abatement certainty. #ClimateEmergency
@JustinHGillis @GeoffreySupran @guardian @rickheede With respect, both addressing demand and addressing supply really matter: (1) https://t.co/x40ntkpaae (2) https://t.co/XOnpVsTTid (3) https://t.co/fBVMzhqN3Z (4) https://t.co/5xjDUzY6nE
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
Canada must demand #ToxicEnergy and #ToxicMaterials corporations clean up #Pollution at abandoned sites, both domestic and foreign. Comments, @StephenHarper? #FIPA #CdnPoli #Elxn43 #Ableg #Oilsands #GreenDesign
RT @SorenHave: God artikel om hvordan brug af politikker til at styre udbud kan være mere effektive (både økonomisk og politisk) end ditto…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies interesting article https://t.co/i856nIU48m
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
@kiteie @Tosh_Mizzau @christoaivalis Etc. There are 4 ways to affect FF use (see Table 1). Restrictive supply-side (RSS) policies have until now been largely ignored by decision makers. They have advantages over other policies: ease to implement, achieve
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
RT @Tzeporah: @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough i…
@cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau @IPCC_CH We need to regulate supply & demand of fossil fuels if we are going to act fast enough in time to keep us safe. We need to plan for a below two degree world. https://t.co/OKw16FdPcV /18 #ClimateEmergency
@R4nd4hl @oestergaard Følger dig nu - så du kan bare sende. Men en af de gode videnskabelige artikler, der opsummerer både politiske og økonomiske fordele ved udbudspolitik, er den her: https://t.co/SZwTtakECU
@hoej_h @Susanne_Zimmer_ @alternativet_ Der er faktisk gode argumenter for også at fjerne udbuddet af olie - se mere her: https://t.co/PXfcDqHZkz
@skaye @JimmyZ51174789 @GrogsGamut So you didn't read beyond the title? Well that is embarrassing. The article is an explanation of this paper https://t.co/9KHrPCsLZW I linked to the article rather than the paper to make it easier for you to understan
RT @RDNS_TAI: @DoctorKarl Also @DoctorKarl - we have been told for a long time to solely focus on who burns fossil fuels bit who sells them…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @DoctorKarl Also @DoctorKarl - we have been told for a long time to solely focus on who burns fossil fuels bit who sells them…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @DoctorKarl Also @DoctorKarl - we have been told for a long time to solely focus on who burns fossil fuels bit who sells them…
@DoctorKarl Also @DoctorKarl - we have been told for a long time to solely focus on who burns fossil fuels bit who sells them...but that’s not how we deal with whaling, chlorofluorocarbons, land mines or elicit drugs. Academic article here https://t.co/b55
@rcollier @WSJ Not saying not necessary or needed or effective as far as they go. We need to cut with both sides of the scissors though: https://t.co/7uTLCWlvtr
@MBJolnas @BrianVad Tjene? Hvem investerer, og med hvilken garanti? Vi skal ikke investere i fortiden. Det giver lock-in. Se fx -> https://t.co/PXfcDqqot1
RT @fergusgreen: For more background, my paper with @RDNS_TAI explains why cutting carbon pollution with "both arms of the scissors" - usin…
For more background, my paper with @RDNS_TAI explains why cutting carbon pollution with "both arms of the scissors" - using demand AND supply side tools - makes economic and political sense. https://t.co/iRwdODZgse
@helenehagel Dog ærgerlig over at lækageeffekt på 100% bare tages for givet, så det kommer til at virke som om udbudspolitik ikke har effekt. Har @madsnyvold mon set denne artikel? https://t.co/PXfcDqqot1
@LejeSvend @husmanden @larsjensen4204 @JensMattiasGP @enlem @larskohler @msaebye @IdaAuken @helenehagel @TScavenius @claus_ekman @24syv @triermogensen @alternativet_ @dr2deadline @PriceofOil @david_turnbull @collinrees Some more reads on these dynamics: ht
@claus_ekman @IdaAuken @msaebye @24syv @triermogensen @TScavenius @alternativet_ @dr2deadline Derudover: 1. Som @brianvad siger skal det sikres udvindingen ikke subsidieres. Det advarede vismændene også imod. Alligevel blev der givet skatterabat (som APMM
RT @SorenHave: God artikel om hvordan brug af politikker til at styre udbud kan være mere effektive (både økonomisk og politisk) end ditto…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
@kennethjakobsen Jo. Det giver god mening både at arbejde med udbud og efterspørgsel. https://t.co/cmbWaNW5uF
@notoriuscrd Here's a good overview of the academic literature: https://t.co/fDy6X6xWtJ
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
RT @fergusgreen: Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inc…
Powerful & important message, @antonioguterres. Since you're endorsing no new coal plants by 2020, why not (on pain of inconsistency) also call for no new coal MINES by 2020 (at least thermal coalmines)? Gotta Cut with Both Arms of the Scissors https:/
RT @jnoisecat: moreover, a reasonable political economic approach to climate policy means we have to take on fossil fuel supply. here’s a c…
RT @jnoisecat: moreover, a reasonable political economic approach to climate policy means we have to take on fossil fuel supply. here’s a c…
moreover, a reasonable political economic approach to climate policy means we have to take on fossil fuel supply. here’s a citation: https://t.co/BizCS1ixKM
@karinhelwig @tomhillonline A good start would be to stop granting new exploration licenses. After that, I suppose there can be different approaches to restricting supply. This is a nice paper about how it's important to tackle both demand and supply for f
A propos dagens rapport fra @DORsSekretariat og diskussionspapir fra @klimaraadet som begge berørte kød: Det nytter også at fjerne udbud. #dkgreen #dkøko #dkpol
@keithalexander My intent was to comment rather than complain. If you haven't already seen it, you might like this article which discusses the economic and political advantages of supply-side policies (the shaded part of Table 1). https://t.co/PG8gpAvdX3 h
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
@EmilSpaan @freeksels @HenriBontenbal Reductie in investeringen in O&G heeft wel degelijk invloed op de vraag naar O&G. Lees o.a.: https://t.co/OD3Ap7QIfc
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
RT @fergusgreen: Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse https:/…
Absolutely - need to Cut fossil fuels with Both Arms of the Scissors - demand and supply! https://t.co/iRwdODZgse
@FedeWeninger Lets hope so - but energy demand can be driven by supply. The cheaper energy becomes, the more we tend to use. That's why supply side constraints are so important. We may only cut globally when we use both arms of the scissors https://t.co/O9
@fester_thomas We stand a better chance of cutting emissions globally (rather than moving them around), if we cut with both arms of the scissors https://t.co/O9sZCHKBPu
RT @Vedv_Energi: @Jeppehartmann @rasmusnordqvist @Orsted @Total @DrivkraftDK @eon Pt. trækker #dkpol udbuds- og efterspørgselsvirkemidler f…
RT @Vedv_Energi: @Jeppehartmann @rasmusnordqvist @Orsted @Total @DrivkraftDK @eon Pt. trækker #dkpol udbuds- og efterspørgselsvirkemidler f…
@Jeppehartmann @rasmusnordqvist @Orsted @Total @DrivkraftDK @eon Pt. trækker #dkpol udbuds- og efterspørgselsvirkemidler for fossiler i hver sin retning. Eftersp.-virkem. vil mindske mængden af fossil, udbuds-virkem øge den. Man bør bruge begge sæt virke
@iouwon @MagsCGF As you already said, demand-side measures without supply-side measures just mean that someone else burns the oil you produce. We need to cut with both arms of the scissors https://t.co/O9sZCHKBPu
@SpenceEnergyUT @arvindpawan1 Just to randomly jump in on this, @arvindpawan1 is right on dirty CA oil...AND there's a lot out there on the need to tackle both supply and demand for oil vis a vis climate. See, for instance: https://t.co/VRBuyDKzTi and http
@BetjentBent @alternativet_ @uffeelbaek Udbud giver også lavere pris og dermed øget efterspørgsel. Læs gerne mere her: https://t.co/PXfcDqqot1
RT @RDNS_TAI: @PeterGleick Supply side policies, like restrictions on new exploration or restrictions n building new coal mines, have been…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @PeterGleick Supply side policies, like restrictions on new exploration or restrictions n building new coal mines, have been…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @PeterGleick Supply side policies, like restrictions on new exploration or restrictions n building new coal mines, have been…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @PeterGleick Supply side policies, like restrictions on new exploration or restrictions n building new coal mines, have been…
@PeterGleick Supply side policies, like restrictions on new exploration or restrictions n building new coal mines, have been overlooked for decades. Plenty of arguments for why we need to shift our policy thinking https://t.co/b55ylwzuVX
RT @RDNS_TAI: @DrSimEvans @fergusgreen and I spelt out the general theory of the economic and political benefits of supply side climate pol…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @DrSimEvans @fergusgreen and I spelt out the general theory of the economic and political benefits of supply side climate pol…
@DrSimEvans @fergusgreen and I spelt out the general theory of the economic and political benefits of supply side climate policy here...but concerns that it might be possible to boost profits and cut emissions at the same time make it a no go topic for man
RT @GeoffreySupran: 5/n: Similarly, climate policy analyst @fergusgreen & economist @RDNS_TAI make the peer-reviewed "economic and politica…