@PatrickSePhelps @nickofnz Closing down ports doesn't change total fossil fuel supply. It just constrains imports. We need to address both supply and demand, in Aotearoa and everywhere. https://t.co/fTN1dlD6qX
more reasons why we need to do more on restricting supply side. Doing only green supportive incentives policies are not enough. This paper is another one in the similar thread https://t.co/11YtAKpI8o
@Komanoff @mateosfo @jonorcutt try this: https://t.co/aFAyqHY5eo
@mateosfo @Komanoff @jonorcutt Respectfully, I don't agree. https://t.co/7uTLCWm3iZ
RT @fergusgreen: The lesson is that climate advocates need to strategically mix demand- and supply-side policies: the former will be more f…
Interessant artikkel i lenken her👇Hvordan ville denne vurderingen slått ut for Norge? @RosendahlKE @abjartnes @sannekarin @Mohnitor
RT @fergusgreen: The lesson is that climate advocates need to strategically mix demand- and supply-side policies: the former will be more f…
RT @fergusgreen: The lesson is that climate advocates need to strategically mix demand- and supply-side policies: the former will be more f…
RT @fergusgreen: The lesson is that climate advocates need to strategically mix demand- and supply-side policies: the former will be more f…
The lesson is that climate advocates need to strategically mix demand- and supply-side policies: the former will be more feasible when #FossilFuel prices are high; the latter more so when FF prices are low. We need to "cut with both arms of the scissors".
RT @RDNS_TAI: @LEANAustralia @R_o_d_C I’d be happy to put on a briefing on the economics of supply side policies for your members. This aca…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @LEANAustralia @R_o_d_C I’d be happy to put on a briefing on the economics of supply side policies for your members. This aca…
RT @RDNS_TAI: @LEANAustralia @R_o_d_C I’d be happy to put on a briefing on the economics of supply side policies for your members. This aca…
@LEANAustralia @R_o_d_C I’d be happy to put on a briefing on the economics of supply side policies for your members. This academic article I co-wrote about them is easy to read & one of the most widely cited academic articles published that year. And i
The optimal path is almost certainly both: "When combined with demand side policies, supply side policies ⬇️ the required carbon price, dampen reliance on CO2 removal tech, & ⬆️ investment in renewable energy." https://t.co/qIcgTFZ3hO On supply-side se
@ShanuMathew93 this paper about political coalitions for each arm of scissor https://t.co/6O1cfvsLKd
@JesseJenkins There was an interesting academic paper on this a few years ago: https://t.co/rSexTa35y3. I'm in two minds. The European transition away from fossil gas has been accelerated by supply-side restrictions (ie the war) but the true test will be
RT @MarkVinPaul: From this paper https://t.co/D4FJWefgMf
From this paper https://t.co/D4FJWefgMf
RT @jamieclimate: @drvolts And on the flip side, take a stab at what more of a supply side strategy could deliver: combined with IRA, how c…
@drvolts And on the flip side, take a stab at what more of a supply side strategy could deliver: combined with IRA, how could more exec actions on fossil fuels drive down emissions? Like: https://t.co/3CH8J9iYEt
@mahirilgaz Cut with both arms of the scissors! https://t.co/ZOjPrJ8Z4S
RT @greenprofgreen: @LMTozer @cehoicka @envirodefence @lev_jf 6/ Emissions reductions goal for oil and gas: 31% below 2005 levels in 2030 &…
@LMTozer @cehoicka @envirodefence @lev_jf 6/ Emissions reductions goal for oil and gas: 31% below 2005 levels in 2030 & consultations to “define and implement a cap on oil and gas sector emissions.” There's no decarbonization w/o controlling supply.
RT @BevansAdvocate: Of course cutting supply is good too, we can do both, a great piece by @RDNS_TAI https://t.co/mrwVUTf56K
yeah im a supply-sider (reducing supply of fossil fuels to fight climate change) https://t.co/ZuFz8Jl51Z
Laten we daar mee beginnen, ja... @nos RT @HiskeArts: @JillesAppelscha @ErnstKuiper @PieterZijlstra2 @Nieuwsuur Dit verhaal mis ik: https://t.co/CsKOcOce0o
@JillesAppelscha @ErnstKuiper @PieterZijlstra2 @Nieuwsuur Dit verhaal mis ik: https://t.co/kOLIjvTMBb
@AkshatRathi They are not at all mutually exclusive. Both are important, and there is a growing body of scholarship that demonstrates this: https://t.co/fBVMzhqN3Z
Open Access UCL Research: Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies - UCL Discovery https://t.co/IrdVJ6DYeB
RT @RDNS_TAI: @BevansAdvocate @DavidSligar Supply side policies such as bans on the construction of NEW coal mines and gas wells change rel…
@BevansAdvocate @DavidSligar Supply side policies such as bans on the construction of NEW coal mines and gas wells change relative prices, drive climate action and protect the jobs of those working in EXISTING fossil fuel projects https://t.co/b55ylwREa5
@ArneOlsonE3 @invw I don't mean to imply that you seek to hold back meaningful action, but that may be the effect your politics. One can make a counter case for the political *advantages* of sticks. As @drvolts did in this 2018 piece: https://t.co/ba3eKdd
Some governments have begun to act through adopting 'supply-side climate policies' targeting #fossilfuel production to complement emission reduction policies, thereby starting to 'cut with both arms of the scissors' @fergusgreen @RDNS_TAI https://t.co/1mw
@Rory_Johnston @DanWoy Some light reading to start with before going further with this discussion: https://t.co/bYUN0kLdvP
@topikanerva @jgkoomey @robsmallshire @KetanJ0 I think we need both really. There's quite a bit of scholarship on the reasons why. Supply can create its own demand, but even in the best case for cutting demand, allowing supply to grow creates more economic
RT @fossiltreaty: @KetanJ0 It’s also an unnecessary choice. We can cut with both arms of the scissors (supply-side and demand-side policies…
RT @fossiltreaty: @KetanJ0 It’s also an unnecessary choice. We can cut with both arms of the scissors (supply-side and demand-side policies…
@KetanJ0 It’s also an unnecessary choice. We can cut with both arms of the scissors (supply-side and demand-side policies) at once. https://t.co/ZOjPrIQPQK
@JasonBordoff Restricting fossil supply and demand at the same time is essential as it avoids leakage, lock-in, and green paradox discounting. It also addressed the political reality that #fossilfuel interests work actively to undermine all forms of #clima
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
RT @cherrytsoi: The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https…
The highlighted field in this table is where Canada sorely lacks in climate policy. Source: https://t.co/yfORG6f23D https://t.co/aaIuw3kfur
RT @70sBachchan: 8/ New generation, radicalised by failure of '09 Copenhagen, '15 Paris & in univ divestment campaigns, are now focused on…
RT @70sBachchan: 7/ #KeystoneXL Pertinent article on why anti-fossil supply side political coalitions are more effective than consumer-side…
(Bonus tweet - see, for example, https://t.co/fBVMzhqN3Z; https://t.co/LhzK17CxdX; https://t.co/MonlDPYfS2)
2/3 Here is a good academic source boosting supply-side climate policy https://t.co/nusvHcqKnP
RT @Fem015: @BasEickhout Ik kijk uit naar de alliantie die tekent voor snelle vermindering van fossiele brandstof. Of nog beter: n wet. Hoo…
@BasEickhout Ik kijk uit naar de alliantie die tekent voor snelle vermindering van fossiele brandstof. Of nog beter: n wet. Hoog tijd voor restrictive supply side measures! Een normaal overheidsinstrument voor problemen waar de markt niet uitkomt - zoals
@citizensclimate @EcologyNature This paper discusses climate policies targeted at both demand and supply. Possibly supply side measures are politically difficult to implement. Nevertheless, and as can be observed in the Dutch Shell case, because of Paris,
@jamieclimate @KevinSLeahy @ieefa_institute @CarbonBubble @SEI_Erickson So many answers to this after so many years of years of skepticism from carbon counters. Let’s start with this: https://t.co/7uTLCWlvtr
8/ New generation, radicalised by failure of '09 Copenhagen, '15 Paris & in univ divestment campaigns, are now focused on how to avoid fossil infrastructure (eg from US- buildout of gas pipelines, power plants) that locks-in emissions for DECADES. ht
7/ #KeystoneXL Pertinent article on why anti-fossil supply side political coalitions are more effective than consumer-side ones:'Cutting with both arms of the Scissors'. Concentrated harms of extraction & pollution is more salient than CO2 ht @fergusg
@icowrich @simonahac Interesting debate, but its one that exists in no other policy domain. Economic theory and democratic reality suggest we focus on supply and demand. There’s no reason to pick teams https://t.co/b55ylwzuVX
@MaKriKaLi @PoliisiRikokset Aloitus koski Hollannissa käynnistettyä öljy-yhtiötä koskevaa päätöstä. Supply-side puhuttaa paljon, IEA itse asiassa juuri tällä viikolla nosti tämän asian esille. Tässä myös yksi akateeminen paperi tuotantopuolen rajoituksista
RT @BayouTerrier: But you should definitely spend some time with @fergusgreen & @RDNS_TAI's paper below to move beyond the demand side fram…
RT @BayouTerrier: But you should definitely spend some time with @fergusgreen & @RDNS_TAI's paper below to move beyond the demand side fram…
But you should definitely spend some time with @fergusgreen & @RDNS_TAI's paper below to move beyond the demand side framing. ✂️https://t.co/KVkrMxYSFJ
@runningman_2021 @alexhazanov @SevaUT Read up on some supply side economics and we can get back to this conversation at a later date. https://t.co/KVkrMxYSFJ https://t.co/7nlLJcNGUC
@EricCrampton That's an argument against supply side policies in general. I think we need both supply and demand side policies (see eg https://t.co/fTN1dlCyBp).
@jm_mcgrath Agreed, but we need to address both supply and demand (cut with both sides of the scissors): https://t.co/fDy6X6xWtJ
@oratoryrupture @CarbonBubble @GretaThunberg We need to use both arms of the scissors - supply and demand. It doesn’t have to be one or the other. Important piece here from @RDNS_TAI @fergusgreen on the topic here. https://t.co/ZOjPrIQPQK
@MichaelEMann Agree entirely. So much effort has gone into the need to reduce demand for fossil fuels that plans to enormously boost the supply of fossil fuels have oven evaded attention. We need to cut with both arms if the scissors https://t.co/b55ylwR6k
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @jgkoomey: Green, Fergus, and Richard Denniss. 2018. "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restri…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
RT @fergusgreen: "Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it mean…
"Addressing the growing gap between fossil fuel production and our climate targets requires a redefinition of what it means to be a climate leader ... we need to cut with both hands of the scissors, addressing demand and supply simultaneously." @RDNS_TAI h
@FlemmingMoller Sludder og vrøvl. En saks med to blade klipper nu engang bedre end en saks med ét https://t.co/fNIsuQlf5y
@olavelg @NorAndreas @RosendahlKE @Naturvern @LeneWestgaard @DanPederEriksen @andreasrandoy @NatureClimate Her er en artikkel til om temaet. https://t.co/5EyOt3aUuq
@70sBachchan @KetanJ0 @MichaelWWara This article spells it out nicely: https://t.co/ecIgxdfxOx
RT @jgkoomey: Green, Fergus, and Richard Denniss. 2018. "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restri…
...just like FF policy should combined supply and demand-side measures (@fergusgreen @RDNS_TAI), political opposition needs to address demand too and not just leave that to the technocrats because the industry will draw power from rebounding demand. http
@andrew_leach No one is suggesting inaction on climate. I am suggesting action is needed on both supply and demand. https://t.co/7RO0OvhMkm
@Paulin_Anne Det er en politisk beslutning, så man kan selvfølgelig gøre som man vil. Jeg vil bare gerne have at man er konsistente i argumentationen, her ift lækage. I øvrigt kan jeg anbefale nedenstående vedr lækagediskussionen. #dkgreen https://t.co/P
RT @SorenHave: Derfor: Støt borgerforslag om stop for yderligere efterforskning i Nordsøen: https://t.co/fDMuLqScCY #stopoliejagtennu
Derfor: Støt borgerforslag om stop for yderligere efterforskning i Nordsøen: https://t.co/fDMuLqScCY #stopoliejagtennu
RT @jgkoomey: @DoctorVive @ramez @KevinSLeahy @noahqk @ColumbiaSIPA Green, Fergus, and Richard Denniss. 2018. "Cutting with both arms of th…
👇🏼 Though I’d argue it does (or can) serve as an *immediate* catalyst for localized fracking/drilling prohibitions (e.g., fed public lands withdrawal bills) + imposes pressure on regulators to prevent/reduce harm.
@cohan_ds @arvindpawan1 @timothyjwyant @MaxJerneck @CostaSamaras Perhaps 'Ban Fracking' is for political coalition building & investor signaling purposes & not immediate policy? Nice article on why it is easier to build anti-fossil supply side poli
@Glen4Climate @ElizabethMay important to end the growth of supply, and supporting research here: https://t.co/JyA6ntWdBO
(FWIW I suspect some justifications will survive, others won't - e.g. I have my doubts that claims of efficiency survive untouched the transition from ideal theory to the real world.) https://t.co/R1kvj3XfeJ