@Nibor_Tolum @MisterOz5 @LapiGreg Après faudra m'expliquer en quoi Raoult était dans le faux quand il a essayé de traiter en premier instant avec de la HCQ quand celle ci était recommandée pdt l'épidémie de sras-cov en 2003 ? https://t.co/k9EhD3d1Eg
@Laurie_Garrett Link to actual study: https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@PeterHotez @axios Many scientist were banned or censored on this platform during covid for just sharing this. https://t.co/YSFP0Haa76
@MattDodson12 @MikeFrancoAR501 @DrSuneelDhand Here's the study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@Richard05826939 @MikeFrancoAR501 @DrSuneelDhand Here's the actual 2005 article proving hcq effective against Sars coronavirus https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@peacegoddess69 @MikeFrancoAR501 @DrSuneelDhand Here's the study FROM 2005 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@Alexwalnu @metejtme @DrSuneelDhand 2005... hcq was proven effective against Sars coronavirus. But you can't bring an eua jab with billions of profits on the line, to market if there's a known treatment available. 🤔 THEY put profits over people. Disgusting
@FairlyFelicity @DrSuneelDhand Here's the actual study, from 2005... https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@bfhermann @DrSuneelDhand Here's the study Yet anyone "doing their own research" and not taking these corrupted politicians and bought out scientist at their word are the crazy ones... 😄 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@Peony1167 @Wired2Jam @DrSuneelDhand Except we KNEW other treatments were well researched, safe and effective, widely available and not a money making machine for a drug company with record fines for lying and misleading and bribery... 2005 it was proven h
@SeahawkDriver @Wired2Jam @DrSuneelDhand Here's the 2005 study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@Dr_dreamchaser Oh, and seeing as you like science papers, here's one for you. Written by the NIH. They knew. https://t.co/eoB17CxQ6R
@steven_schnegg @nickmmark Here's the specific study from 2005, showing hcq effective against Sars https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@OhNoDano @jathorpmfm You sure about that. Look, I know how hard you are trying not to lose face in our little discussion, but it isn't working. This is from 2005 https://t.co/HKv8Eryo42
@WarClandestine @mcuban Meanwhile in 2005, after the first outbreak of COVID... BIG Pharma already knew... But there is no money in generic cures... Right Mr @mcuban ? https://t.co/4BbwNpOGLD
@Clucky92864053 Why does HCQ work: 2014 Chloroquine Is a Zinc Ionophore https://t.co/UnlmBNIgHW They knew HCQ worked 14 yrs before C-19: 2005 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/wdtguCQF0D
RT @marianeborie: @MichelJeanDomi1 @raoult_didier On rappellera que l’efficacité de l’HCQ sur les coronavirus est prouvée depuis au moins 2…
@johnmalcolm1970 @Cryptomurderinc @ABridgen Profits over people. Disgusting! Here's the study, from 2005... https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
Interesting if true; Chloroquine was also proven to be effective against the original 2005 SARS but that was hysterically denied during COVID ”Published online 2005 Aug 22. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread” https:
RT @1stacyphillips: @dezzie_rezzie @doc_singing "The Science" knew it in 2005. https://t.co/T1TWq4orfP Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor…
RT @1stacyphillips: @dezzie_rezzie @doc_singing "The Science" knew it in 2005. https://t.co/T1TWq4orfP Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor…
@dezzie_rezzie @doc_singing "The Science" knew it in 2005. https://t.co/T1TWq4orfP Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J. 2005 Aug 22;2:69. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69. PMID: 16115318; PMCID: PMC1232869.
RT @aileastick1: @lucyBratDs @Le_Figaro Même adulte, certains ont besoin qu'on leur tienne la main pour découvrir le chemin. https://t.co/o…
Looks like they knew about Chloroquine/HCQ's potential in 2005: https://t.co/rKmiF3QnKY
@barbaramccarren @MikeCD33 @RadioFreeTom Here's the actual study from 2005 also. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@flwingnut @thomasglee @RadioFreeTom Here's the actual study proving hcq is effective against Sars. Just because the TELLAVISION PROGRAMS you to think we're all crazy, you stay close minded to important info you'll never hear them say. Better to think for
@KaJo503 @RadioFreeTom https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu Here's the study from 2005.
@petegrif @MaverickInvests @NotcherBeeswax @dieteratswift @realDailyTrite @RadioFreeTom Here's the specific study: https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@JosephPoulin175 @Alden_Mann @RadioFreeTom @MkdDebbie @mehdirhasan Here's the actual study. There's MOUNTAINS of info out there you will never even know to look for because you're too dismissive and close minded to look for yourself. You simply name call a
RT @BastienThierry4: @Pr_EChabriere c'est cette article ? https://t.co/9IpjUQ1wSL
@samijow @realDailyTrite @WarClandestine @RadioFreeTom Here's the actual study from 2005, showing hcq effective in treating Sars. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@ProofofBrain_ @jakeshieldsajj @RadioFreeTom Here's the actual study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@FuzzyDav @jineeminee @RadioFreeTom Here's the actually study from 2005 proving hcq was effective against Sars. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@Goreshade @AK4WA @PeterHotez Here's the actual study from 2005 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@TomMunderwear @Alli_mi76 @PeterHotez Here's the actual study PROVING HCQ was a known treatment for Sars. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@LeftwardSwing @GMONEYPEPE @PeterHotez Here's the actual study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@SeeYourGift @LimitingThe @PeterHotez Here's the actual study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@kevinlh1975 @e_21106 @BowTiedRanger @PeterHotez Here is the actual study showing hcq was a PROVEN treatment for Sars in 2005 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@MissEllieMP @nataliecarey__ @PeterHotez Here's the actual study from 2005 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@TickTock2023 @PeterHotez Including the hcq lie. They knew in 2005 it was effective against Sars but lied to get eua for jab. https://t.co/L12MbiDAQN https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@jn_pickles @JohnStrandUSA @PeterHotez Better than a known "medical expert" responsible for the azt deaths. You know hcq was PROVEN to treat Sars in 2005, right? So fauci LIED to get eua for jabs, thereby making tons of money off the dead. Can't get eua if
RT @NikkiRhyne82: @Mister_Gone_ @Shuff1138 @PeterHotez @RobertKennedyJr Here's the actual study they hid and lied about that could've saved…
@Mister_Gone_ @Shuff1138 @PeterHotez @RobertKennedyJr Here's the actual study they hid and lied about that could've saved so many worldwide. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@WarClandestine @PeterHotez Here's the actual study from 2005 https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
RT @aileastick1: @lucyBratDs @Le_Figaro Même adulte, certains ont besoin qu'on leur tienne la main pour découvrir le chemin. https://t.co/o…
@EtienneVerpin @ame_litte @Acermendax Oui simplement actif sur le premier SRAS mais ça n'a sans doute rien à voir.... 🤡https://t.co/bbc1qgA8wz
RT @LJ3jey1: @ChampoDr @fluidloading Pourquoi était-il recommandé lors de l'épidémie de sras-cov en 2003 ? Y a-t-il eu une surmortalité obs…
RT @Swartzentrub17: @jamesburrell2 @calleymeans @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr Another nice one by Fauci https://t.co/r80L15R5bx
@jamesburrell2 @calleymeans @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr Another nice one by Fauci https://t.co/r80L15R5bx
@Bluemke329 @joerogan They knew hcq was extremely effective again covid in 2005. They chose to discredit it to push the snake oil vaccine. Can't get an eua if there's a treatment available. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@ChampoDr @fluidloading Pourquoi était-il recommandé lors de l'épidémie de sras-cov en 2003 ? Y a-t-il eu une surmortalité observé dû à l'utilisation de la chloroquine à cette date ? https://t.co/NotINhmbll
RT @aileastick1: @lucyBratDs @Le_Figaro Même adulte, certains ont besoin qu'on leur tienne la main pour découvrir le chemin. https://t.co/o…
@lucyBratDs @Le_Figaro Même adulte, certains ont besoin qu'on leur tienne la main pour découvrir le chemin. https://t.co/oj4BbdRrpo
@lucyBratDs @Le_Figaro Même adulte, certain ont besoin qu'on leur tienne la main pour découvrir le chemin. https://t.co/oj4BbdRrpo
@bonnesante73 @ChatSecouriste @Un_IDE_Linuxien une étude en date de 2005 https://t.co/9IpjUQ1wSL
@Pr_EChabriere c'est cette article ? https://t.co/9IpjUQ1wSL
@dogpoopelosi1 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn #FollowTheMoney Consider: Trashing HCQ will make billions via vaccines & anti-viral drugs. Those for HCQ will gain nothing. Liberty means
@Richardkimble45 2005 NIH study linked below finds HCQ a Corona Virus Wonder Drug! https://t.co/1klEzGHdxn #FollowTheMoney Consider: Trashing HCQ will make billions via vaccines & anti-viral drugs. Those for HCQ will gain nothing. Liberty mean
Alles was onjuist bij een overlevings kans van 99,9%. #GreatReset Hydroxychloroquine is een "moderne" synthetische versie van kinine dat al eeuwenlang wordt gebruikt. https://t.co/XqOi3MzCju https://t.co/dndO0tBkYf https://t.co/tMXtvOeIcf
Just a reminder, they KNEW it was effective and fought against making it available, knowing that people would die... https://t.co/Njvf8vQgKU
@DeforrestFrank @jeffreyatucker 2) How was he not aware of this study from 2005 within a couple of days of the US learning we were looking at SARS. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/HKv8Eryo42 🤔 Orders
@QueInsu @Juan2467 @Agri_energie @wargonm Oui j'ai obtenu à la sueur de mon front le droit d'accéder au CE1, donc je sais lire. https://t.co/bbc1qgA8wz
@thereal_truther @P_McCulloughMD Fauci knew this in 2005 https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
@thereal_truther Fauci knew all along... https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
Personnellement... Je ne sais pas reconnaître un virus à couronne d'un autre virus à couronne. Pouvez vous m'expliquer ce qui fait la particularité du dernier ? Le nom ou la marque ? https://t.co/wFJXkDe6vO ( 2005 ) 🤔🤔🤔 #CQFR
@funnyvalle @JonathanSturel @idrissaberkane Personnellement... Je ne sais pas reconnaître un virus à couronne d'un autre virus à couronne. Pouvez vous m'expliquer ce qui fait la particularité du dernier ? Le nom ou la marque ? https://t.co/wFJXkDeElm ( 200