@VigilantFox August 22, 2005, Lancet Study proves Chloroquine (HCQ) hydroxychloroquine is effective against SARS coronavirus. https://t.co/7toeMMfVo4
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
RT @GenugAgain: @VigilantFox we knew, they knew we knew, they murdered anyway. https://t.co/tXpdD9Dxft we read the meds..... we always ha…
@dr_jon_l @akheriaty In 2005 Fauci knew... https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
@Georgetown @kksheld @GUMedicine @McCourtSchool Fauci knew in 2005... https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
RT @NikkiRhyne82: @StacieAnne99 @MichaelCWilder @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello They knew hcq worked against Sars. Fauci denied it so they co…
RT @NikkiRhyne82: @StacieAnne99 @MichaelCWilder @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello They knew hcq worked against Sars. Fauci denied it so they co…
@_aussie17 FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2, COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID & Moderna VAX design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #Zelenko
RT @NikkiRhyne82: @StacieAnne99 @MichaelCWilder @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello They knew hcq worked against Sars. Fauci denied it so they co…
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/qzbSHxgnI1
RT @NikkiRhyne82: @MichaelCWilder @cathyslifeSP @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello Fauci knew hcq worked against Sars. Since 2005... https://t.c…
@MichaelCWilder @cathyslifeSP @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello Fauci knew hcq worked against Sars. Since 2005... https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@StacieAnne99 @MichaelCWilder @DrKellyVictory @DarrellMello They knew hcq worked against Sars. Fauci denied it so they could get the eua jab to market and make all that money. Science has become profits, not people sadly. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@HotepJesus P.S. This study was floatin round Twitter so much in '20 was BECAUSE it was 2Y POST CoV-1 OBreak n Fauci's NIH felt they'd discovered a prophylaxis (prevent, a vaccine) 4 the SARS-CoV virus w/ Chloroquine. HCQ is a better version of same catego
RT @Kitty9309: @utahmom333 @FarmerLou72 @BelannF @brixwe Here (I also dislike when sources are left out.) https://t.co/hmcutqIYTR
@utahmom333 @FarmerLou72 @BelannF @brixwe Here (I also dislike when sources are left out.) https://t.co/hmcutqIYTR
@MarioNawfal Chloroquine was only shown to kill SARS1 in-vitro, which does not translate to effectiveness: https://t.co/OUVhdFJnw7 Uttar Pradesh lowered COVID counts using testing and a large vaccination campaign: https://t.co/DdpVnlqd3y
They also blocked HCQ as a treatment when in 2005 Fauci wrote a publication article saying it was helpful…https://t.co/lNvToR9Q8P
@GinaSaysSo He also knew that since 2005, when the first study on HCQ was published: https://t.co/naC3hVWVig
@AlmaTostmann @mkeulemans @PvanHouwelingen @WybrenvanHaga in 2005 werkte HCQ nog wel, Zie pubmed https://t.co/MVyzw0lwbN
@Bert10146608 @jamiemcintyre21 They knew hcq was effective against Sars coronavirus in 2005. However, you can receive billions for an eua jab if there's an effective treatment available. So they chose profits over millions of peoples lives. https://t.co/T
@GettheTo @ArturoInti @jamiemcintyre21 MILLIONS died worldwide because this study was hidden to the general public so everyone could get paid. Absolutely disgusting what science and medicine have become at the gov level. Still hard to process. Yet when di
@VeteranGaming75 @jamiemcintyre21 They've known since 2005, including fauci, that hcq was effective against Sars coronavirus. They lied because you cannot receive an eua for a billion dollar jab if there's an effective treatment available. https://t.co/Tvq
@ColleenAckert @kevinnbass 2)Of course, that would be assuming that Fauci had brought this NIH study from 2005 to the President's attention in early January when we first knew we were looking at a SARS virus. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coron
@the32ndstfool @therationalpost @mehdirhasan For shits and Gigs https://t.co/yvasG8B6VL
@Bo_Gardiner @Passow_mcm @MSNBC @ZeeshanAleem Profits over people. That's the current $cience https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@SadGirlzClub_66 @darktwistturtle @GadflyDer @LoneStarBitcoin @RussOnPolitics @JoJoFromJerz Under EUA they can’t release an new med if there ‘s already a medication that can be used to treat, even if it’s for another purpose. Did u know Fauci’s NIH used a
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread; data clearly shows that chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV if the drug is added immediately following virus adsorption: https
@Ankh_Morporkian @semahon1 @NotAHoax Thimerosal Ddt Lobotomy Hcq in Sars coronavirus treatment. Fauci knew it worked in 2005. However, you cannot get an eua if there's a proven treatment available. Profits over people. https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@NotAHoax @LaneB7777 @Ankh_Morporkian Profit over people is the new $cience. Open your eyes. Millions could've been saved with this med. But then you cannot receive an eua for an experimental jab worth BILLIONS if a proven treatment is available. https://t
@BaronMunc @VigilantFox @DrSyedHaider And Chloroquine... Fauci knew in 2005 https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
@TOPDOGE007 @VigilantFox @DrSyedHaider Long before that.. Fauci knew about Chloroquine in 2005 https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
2005 👇 in case you didn't know. https://t.co/vCTE2GlFn4
@drdenwalker Fauci knew this In 2005.. https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
THE STUDY: https://t.co/fwYIYPVq8Q
@BrockRiddickIFB The study https://t.co/jqEMG0wlmT
@KariLake Correct There was a 750M prize 2 the Co that came up w/ a workable jab. Problem was Fauci's own NIH called CLQ a "prophylaxis" for SARS-CoV viruses 2Y after CoV-1 OBreak 02-03. HCQ? MUCH better drug! But, they needed that $. So, HCQ & IVM we
@shumsg1956 @TexasLindsay_ Well for starters, fauci himself knew hcq was effective against Sars in 2005... maybe you should ask why HE denied this life saving medicine... Oh! So he could get the eua for jabs and make shit tons of money off sick and dying c
@holisticgrenade @samanthamarika1 😂🤣😂🤣😂 Coronavirus... Those who came into contact with or were infected by SARS 1 are immune to Covid 19 Fauci knew that Choloquine was an effective treatment.. https://t.co/Eu5bYmXr41
This is a fact and it is proven that #Fauci knew.
RT @GraftedIn2: @Wordofbeak @ZelenkoZev They have and had a medication that was effective against SARS coronavirus since August 22, 2005 an…
@Wordofbeak @ZelenkoZev They have and had a medication that was effective against SARS coronavirus since August 22, 2005 and they knew it. It was a COVID-19 Lancet Study on hydroxychloroquine that proves Chloroquine (HCQ) is effective against SARS coronavi
@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr They have and had a medication that was effective against SARS coronavirus since August 22, 2005 and they knew it. It was a COVID-19 Lancet Study on hydroxychloroquine that proves Chloroquine (HCQ) is effective against SARS co
@CarolNefedow @SuzCrimi How about all the studies done prior to 2020 on SARS1 that definitively stated that ivermectin and HCQ were the best defence against a SARS like virus going forward, that they somehow forgot about? From 2005 in the government datab
FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2, COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID & Moderna VAX design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #ZelenkoProtocol P
@RobertKennedyJr FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2, COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID & Moderna VAX design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #Z
@PeterHotez @VICE @annamerlan FAUCI/NIH KNEW BY 2005 NO VAX, NO LOCKDOWNS WERE NEEDED & #HCQ IS PROPHYLACTIC & CURE FOR SARS-CoV1 & 2/COVID02 & COVID19! #FauciLiedMillionsDIED Fauci/NIH funded SARS/COVID design! #FollowTheMONEY CURE = #Ze
@bravi_mike @CryptidsAuthor That doesn't mean he's wrong. In 2003, Chloroquine was a recommended antiviral that ended the SARS CoV-1 pandemic in a few months with fewer than 2k deaths globally. "Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS Co
@VPrasadMDMPH @PeterHotez https://t.co/ZVnTP9QB89 Someone smarter than me make it make sense. https://t.co/JJ5ZeyNmfw
@MdBreathe https://t.co/ZVnTP9QB89 Wouldn’t that have been a lot safer? https://t.co/BwwkbQrLk1
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE FACTS: Back in 2005, the closely related predecessor chemical, Chloroquine, was evaluated against the original SARS virus, and it was concluded that it was a potent inhibitor of SARS; working as both a cure and a prophylactic: https://t
@TroncheBiais En 2005 avec le SARS-CoV-1 c'était déjà prometteur. https://t.co/wHiCZte0em C'est largement confirmé maintenant. https://t.co/1LVdH3DWBz
RT @Demon_Rat_kLrZ: @tomselliott @PeterHotez This clown is the dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor. Thus he should f…
@TroncheBiais La chloroquine est étudiée depuis 2005 contre les coronavirus... Vous nous critiquez parce qu'on refuse un vaccin qui n'a que deux ans par contre vous refusez un médicament utilisé depuis 20 ans?? https://t.co/XjBAka9KYo
@TroncheBiais Non, mais on sait depuis 2005 que ça fonctionne sur les SARS et d'autres pathologies biensur... https://t.co/2qkb5JLpkM https://t.co/eAmlow7sQQ
RT @JeanNmarre11: @David71321863 @LockedFab Oulalaaaa faut pas nous faire de telles descentes d'organes.., on sent que vous êtes pas bien..…
@David71321863 @LockedFab Oulalaaaa faut pas nous faire de telles descentes d'organes.., on sent que vous êtes pas bien... Bon, sinon, de manière générale ça se sait depuis bientôt 20 ans que la chloro est efficace sur les SRAS, et bien d'autres pathologi
@tomselliott @PeterHotez This clown is the dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor. Thus he should familiar with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. He should also be aware of the attached 2005 study:https://t.co/ZpkJu8mdep Nuremburg 2.0
@CamillaFab @SantePubliqueFr Dans la même famille le SARS-CoV-1 lui en 2005 n’a absolument pas posé de problème. Les initiés diront que c’est in vitro et les initiés défaillants diront : « non c’est pas le SARS-CoV-2 » 😂😎🤌🏽🤌🏽🤌🏽 https://t.co/uDwUQo1rAv
RT @Psycho111177: @mieke2 @koen_verhagen @ElsVeen2 @hapelensrob idd, net als Chloroquine. (met voorbedachte rade) https://t.co/Fwzr3i3bwf
@DrFranckClarot Le figaro un sacré magazine scientifique, ou torchon de propagande gouvernemental... https://t.co/IDgaC78dWl Surtout que 2005 : https://t.co/Oo3ruMap9t
@AcidReign10 @FiveTimesAugust @PeterHotez Here's the study https://t.co/TvqyKDIIWu
@goutraillon Surtout que c'était recommandée pour l'épidémie de srascovd en 2003 https://t.co/k9EhD3d1Eg