RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
Important new paper on reliability of cognitive tasks and implications for individual differences research https://t.co/hWhGZMutCu
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @AndrewRAConway: Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @ROBERTO_COLOM: Well-established approaches in experimental psychology may not directly translate to the study of individual differences…
Memory span tasks are a notable exception. Set size works as an experimental manipulation and as a difficulty parameter. Unified Psych FTW. https://t.co/9QwnOrc8ba
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @whlevine: This sounds like incredibly valuable research. https://t.co/dEyNIxdO5f
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
Neat paper! We found similar for WM capacity (reliable) vs. set-size difference scores (pretty unreliable) -- https://t.co/jEifBK9omN https://t.co/nP0ImOSLL1
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @whlevine: This sounds like incredibly valuable research. https://t.co/dEyNIxdO5f
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
The reliability paradox | https://t.co/hLl0PRVZlV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @fernandaedi: Really interesting new article in Behavior Research Methods: https://t.co/gAO31UKsdp
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @GordPennycook: Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
Really interesting new article in Behavior Research Methods: https://t.co/gAO31UKsdp
Wow, this is such an excellent paper. Very important. https://t.co/XACKULdsAl
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
regarding the importance of understanding psychometry in neuroscience 🙋 https://t.co/2Nl4Rl0ec6
RT @whlevine: This sounds like incredibly valuable research. https://t.co/dEyNIxdO5f
This sounds like incredibly valuable research. https://t.co/dEyNIxdO5f
RT @ROBERTO_COLOM: Well-established approaches in experimental psychology may not directly translate to the study of individual differences…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
Un trabajo estimulante.... Deseando meterle mano! https://t.co/1Cft9Ppf60
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
After three months psychometric finally able to read the likes of this article https://t.co/aY2JNmW5JE
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…