RT @mvugt: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual d…
RT @mvugt: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual d…
RT @mvugt: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual d…
While obvious, this is something that we really need to pay more attention to. It's important that we don't sculpt our paradigms so much they loose, well, ecological validity, I suppose. https://t.co/FS0WzMKz8Y
RT @CompBrainBeh: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of indiv…
RT @CompBrainBeh: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of indiv…
Not surprising! https://t.co/sLM2pmfuRk
RT @CompBrainBeh: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of indiv…
RT @CompBrainBeh: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of indiv…
RT @mvugt: must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual d…
must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual differences https://t.co/xsvgiNA0Qt
must-read for cognitive scientists: tasks that are very reliable across sessions by definition are poor measures of individual differences https://t.co/xkdn2pBhxO
RT @tomstafford: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/hxd2MbwyeI…
RT @tomstafford: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/hxd2MbwyeI…
RT @Sam_D_Parsons: This is easily missed in this awesome and detailed paper, but check out supplemental D. tl:dr typically too few trials a…
RT @Sam_D_Parsons: This is easily missed in this awesome and detailed paper, but check out supplemental D. tl:dr typically too few trials a…
This is easily missed in this awesome and detailed paper, but check out supplemental D. tl:dr typically too few trials are used to obtain a robust estimate of the internal consistency of cognitive tasks. This needs to be improved in future research. https:
RT @EdNeuroLab: @etoomari reliability of the SNARC is 0-.49, in the range found by other SNARC test-retest studies. See the article for an…
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/dgP0Sa77C9
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
Reliable tasks within individuals not so good for individual diffs studies... https://t.co/lMBJ1cZFxj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @knutson_brain: Low test-retest reliability implies low power as probes of individual differences in cognition... https://t.co/F7RkdnCGzT
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @knutson_brain: Low test-retest reliability implies low power as probes of individual differences in cognition... https://t.co/F7RkdnCGzT
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
Task specificity rediscovered? https://t.co/th8VqtrUMV
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
I'm not surprised. https://t.co/mtQ30s6pVb
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
@bstojanoski might be of interest! https://t.co/mIYIUBD3Ch
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
Follow link for free copy (open access) https://t.co/xYjNK8Uilr
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
Wonder if similar applies to IAT https://t.co/pBj1fm87YY
RT @JohanBraeken: a.k.a. ranking people gets "difficult" when they perform largely similar on a task :) https://t.co/BqwKplcavS
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JohanBraeken: a.k.a. ranking people gets "difficult" when they perform largely similar on a task :) https://t.co/BqwKplcavS
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @knutson_brain: Low test-retest reliability implies low power as probes of individual differences in cognition... https://t.co/F7RkdnCGzT
@schroeder_psy @Moji_Soli The SNARC reliability here is .22 (.00-.49), while we observed a reliability of .70 in Cipora & Nuerk, 2013. https://t.co/3cv0QjSz1E https://t.co/NdYJ9XOLtg
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JohanBraeken: a.k.a. ranking people gets "difficult" when they perform largely similar on a task :) https://t.co/BqwKplcavS
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
a.k.a. ranking people gets "difficult" when they perform largely similar on a task :) https://t.co/BqwKplcavS
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @EdNeuroLab: @etoomari reliability of the SNARC is 0-.49, in the range found by other SNARC test-retest studies. See the article for an…
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
@etoomari reliability of the SNARC is 0-.49, in the range found by other SNARC test-retest studies. See the article for an important take on why robust group level effects might not be good for IDs. https://t.co/6j6V5kUOLh
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @maxcoltheart: Test-retest reliability of e.g. size of the Stroop effect .6 - is that surprisingly low? Seems fine to me. Individual dif…
Test-retest reliability of e.g. size of the Stroop effect .6 - is that surprisingly low? Seems fine to me. Individual differences in the size of a practice effect. https://t.co/M8WnQ91Aqo
Stick to digit span and coding? https://t.co/7dgDwKlRgg
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
RT @JelteWicherts: The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
The reliability of several popular cognitive tasks is surprisingly low. https://t.co/H93x85ZUyj
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/hxd2MbwyeI consistent task effects = low inter-participant variability = low sensitivity to individual differences
The conundrum is that specific tasks and brain areas will show things (uninterestingly) more reliable and reproducible, cancelling (interesting) inter-individual variation. https://t.co/MKJxbW3DiA 3/3 (judgements in brackets are personal opinions :) )
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
Interesting point: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences... https://t.co/JufEWawTkk
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
RT @EikoFried: "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm…
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/jRUyiDD3BM
"The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/Ag5T9SIAm2 https://t.co/QpLLxFEPDH
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @DobyRahnev: Really important point: to find robust across-subject correlations, you need tasks that produce a lot of across-subject var…