RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @Kane_WMC_Lab: Neat work; not universal. Big experimental efx but also big & reliable individual diffs in antisaccade and SART, which do…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
Really important point: to find robust across-subject correlations, you need tasks that produce a lot of across-subject variability. https://t.co/gupEQd1yx6
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
Possible caveat for stroke research where damage produces individual variability on otherwise robust (low variability) tasks. https://t.co/d78cM5LILI
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @smomara1: This is a really important, but easily overlooked set of issues, regarding replication. https://t.co/VvJH3tw8v9
RT @HeleenASlagter: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQ…
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/BPvDOQrRb2
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
Very important paper-Just what we have recently discussed for ind. diff. in fear conditioning on a theoretical level https://t.co/MQq3yNKmkt https://t.co/L3CIGDz1cS
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @Kane_WMC_Lab: Neat work; not universal. Big experimental efx but also big & reliable individual diffs in antisaccade and SART, which do…
RT @Kane_WMC_Lab: Neat work; not universal. Big experimental efx but also big & reliable individual diffs in antisaccade and SART, which do…
RT @Kane_WMC_Lab: Neat work; not universal. Big experimental efx but also big & reliable individual diffs in antisaccade and SART, which do…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
Neat work; not universal. Big experimental efx but also big & reliable individual diffs in antisaccade and SART, which don't use diff scores https://t.co/9cXetFNw3P
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
This is a great paper! Everyone should check it out (esp go/no go-era @TomSLockhart v relevant for your PhD) https://t.co/dwP99WqEOQ
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
RT @psforscher: Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lP…
Why tasks that produce robust experimental effect make poor individual difference variables h/t @CookieSci https://t.co/4lPZGfTueJ
RT @CookieSci: @psforscher @vuorre @tsawallis Definitely a possibility to the extent it means the target category is undersampled. Suspect…
@psforscher @vuorre @tsawallis Definitely a possibility to the extent it means the target category is undersampled. Suspect bigger culprit is this: https://t.co/n5Hmy0HAGt
@GidonFrischkorn Agree! There's also another recent paper by Craig Hedge taking a similar stance: https://t.co/Cr9apknB31
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
@danjlurie "The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/TxSpBN1Quo
RT @GordPennycook: @hardsci @Blair__Saunders @keanan_joyner @MarinaMilyav @AlxEtz @minzlicht This also seems relevant: "Why robust cognitiv…
@hardsci @Blair__Saunders @keanan_joyner @MarinaMilyav @AlxEtz @minzlicht This also seems relevant: "Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences" https://t.co/EQ2OWnS4rk
フランカー課題やストループ課題等の検査-再検査信頼性が低いことがあるのは、個人間変動が低いから。、頑健で再現性が高いが故に、個人間変動が低いと、信頼性が低くなるというパラドックス。The reliability paradox: https://t.co/1uZbqPOX0O
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @HeatherUrry: Important paper for ppl doing within-subjects experiments w/ hope of examining individual differences https://t.co/uKKaoJR…
Important paper for ppl doing within-subjects experiments w/ hope of examining individual differences https://t.co/uKKaoJRAzc
If study/tasks gives reliable effect amongst gen pop., hard to find inter-pop diff & need new stats https://t.co/Utmum2ILBk
RT @cvonbastian: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/Cr9apknB31
RT @cvonbastian: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/Cr9apknB31
RT @cvonbastian: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/Cr9apknB31
RT @talyarkoni: good discussion (see also https://t.co/M5yXkyXP8r), but disattenuating correlations for unreliability is a *really* dangero…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
I'll read this after the coffee kicks in... https://t.co/s4cywcH2Vc
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/Cr9apknB31
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks don't produce reliable individual differences https://t.co/rJmYlniFP…