↓ Skip to main content

How do different cognitive and linguistic variables contribute to reading in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade

Overview of attention for article published in Reading & Writing, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
How do different cognitive and linguistic variables contribute to reading in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade
Published in
Reading & Writing, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11145-017-9755-z
Authors

Ibrahim A. Asadi, Asaid Khateb, Raphiq Ibrahim, Haitham Taha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Professor 2 12%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 35%
Psychology 3 18%
Linguistics 3 18%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,655,442
of 12,072,146 outputs
Outputs from Reading & Writing
#385
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,670
of 266,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading & Writing
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,072,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.