| Title |
New Zealand school children’s perceptions of local forests and the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators: comparing local and international value systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40490-015-0051-x |
| Authors |
Karen M. Bayne, Barbara K. Höck, Harley R. Spence, Kirsten A. Crawford, Tim W. Payn, Tim D. Barnard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,597,909
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#11
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,892
of 296,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them