↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of sweet potato for fuel bioethanol production: hydrolysis and fermentation

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of sweet potato for fuel bioethanol production: hydrolysis and fermentation
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Lareo, Mario Daniel Ferrari, Mairan Guigou, Lucía Fajardo, Valeria Larnaudie, María Belén Ramírez, Jorge Martínez-Garreiro

Abstract

The enzymatic starch hydrolysis and bioethanol production from a variety of sweet potato developed for bioenergy purposes (K 9807.1) on the basis of its high starch yields, was studied. Drying at 55°C and 95°C of sweet potato neither affected the sugar content nor the starch enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. Simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentations for dry matter ratio of sweet potato to water from 1:8 to 1:2 (w/v) were studied. Fresh sweet potato and dried at 55°C (flour) were assayed. At ratios of 1:8, similar results for fresh sweet potato and flour in terms of ethanol concentration (38-45 g/L), fermentation time (16 h) and sugar conversion (~ 100%) were found. At higher dry matter content, faster full conversion were observed using flour. A higher ratio than that for fresh sweet potato (1:2.2) did not improve the final ethanol concentration (100 g/L) and yields. High ethanol yields were found for VHG (very high gravity) conditions. The sweet potato used is an attractive raw matter for fuel ethanol, since up to 4800 L ethanol per hectare can be obtained.

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 50 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 23%
Engineering 23 13%
Chemical Engineering 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 58 34%