| Title |
Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claude Müller, Thoralf Mildenberger, Daniel Steingruber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,205,869
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#314
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,350
of 428,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.