| Title |
Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y |
| Authors |
Tiffany K. Gunning, Xavier A. Conlan, Paul K. Collins, Alecia Bellgrove, Kaja Antlej, Adam P. A. Cardilini, Catherine L. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,003,829
of 24,071,812 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#358
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,380
of 422,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,812 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.