| Title |
Do patient-reported outcome measures measure up? A qualitative study to examine perceptions and experiences with heart failure proms among diverse, low-income patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-022-00410-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Davis, Kristan Olazo, Maribel Sierra, Michelle E. Tarver, Brittany Caldwell, Anindita Saha, Sarah Lisker, Courtney Lyles, Urmimala Sarkar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 80% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,749,782
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#32
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,702
of 541,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 541,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.