Title |
Alternatives to the conventional ‘Oxford’ tutorial model: a scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41239-021-00265-y |
Authors |
Paul Tristen Balwant, Roshnie Doon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 11% |
Belgium | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 44 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 45 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,615,018
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#354
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,996
of 461,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.