| Title |
Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone reconstruction in jawbone atrophy: a systematic review and case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40902-015-0048-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Umberto Garagiola, Roberto Grigolato, Rossano Soldo, Marco Bacchini, Gianluca Bassi, Rachele Roncucci, Sandro De Nardi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#13
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,751
of 399,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them