Title |
Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13244-020-00955-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mirjam Pot, Nathalie Kieusseyan, Barbara Prainsack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 5 | 31% |
India | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 9 | 56% |
Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Engineering | 7 | 10% |
Computer Science | 6 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Philosophy | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,429,048
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#204
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,642
of 522,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.