The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Field-of-study mismatch and overqualification: labour market correlates and their wage penalty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IZA Journal of Labor Economics , January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40172-016-0052-x |
| Authors |
Guillermo Montt |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 35 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,867,740
of 26,184,895 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Economics
#44
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,338
of 428,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Economics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.