↓ Skip to main content

Field-of-study mismatch and overqualification: labour market correlates and their wage penalty

Overview of attention for article published in IZA Journal of Labor Economics                , January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Field-of-study mismatch and overqualification: labour market correlates and their wage penalty
Published in
IZA Journal of Labor Economics                , January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40172-016-0052-x
Authors

Guillermo Montt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 34 23%
Social Sciences 29 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 58 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Economics               
#43
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,066
of 424,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Economics               
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.