↓ Skip to main content

Tracking dipeptides at work-uptake and intracellular fate in CHO culture

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 1,252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Tracking dipeptides at work-uptake and intracellular fate in CHO culture
Published in
AMB Express, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13568-016-0221-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Sánchez-Kopper, Max Becker, Jennifer Pfizenmaier, Christian Kessler, Andreas Karau, Ralf Takors

Abstract

Market demands for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are steadily increasing worldwide. As a result, production processes using Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) are in the focus of ongoing intensification studies for maximizing cell-specific and volumetric productivities. This includes the optimization of animal-derived component free (ADCF) cultivation media as part of good cell culture practice. Dipeptides are known to improve CHO culture performance. However, little or even conflicting assumptions exist about their putative import and functionality inside the cells. A set of well-known performance boosters and new dipeptide prospects was evaluated. The present study revealed that dipeptides are indeed imported in the cells, where they are decomposed to the amino acids building blocks. Subsequently, they are metabolized or, unexpectedly, secreted to the medium. Monoclonal antibody production boosting additives like L-alanine-L-glutamine (AQ) or glycyl-L-glutamine (GQ) can be assigned to fast or slow dipeptide uptake, respectively, thus pinpointing to the need to study dipeptide kinetics and to adjust their feeding individually for optimizing mAb production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,288,817
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#49
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,963
of 365,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.