| Title |
Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Li, Francesco Carli, Lawrence Lee, Patrick Charlebois, Barry Stein, Alexander S. Liberman, Pepa Kaneva, Berson Augustin, Mingkwan Wongyingsinn, Ann Gamsa, Do Jun Kim, Melina C. Vassiliou, Liane S. Feldman |
| Abstract |
Patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections are at risk for delayed recovery. Prehabilitation aims to enhance functional capacity preoperatively for better toleration of surgery and to facilitate recovery. The authors previously demonstrated the limited impact of a prehabilitation program using exercise alone. They propose an expanded trimodal prehabilitation program that adds nutritional counseling, protein supplementation, and anxiety reduction to a moderate exercise program. This study aimed to estimate the impact of this trimodal program on the recovery of functional capacity compared with standard surgical care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 566 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 14% |
| Researcher | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 10% |
| Other | 51 | 9% |
| Other | 117 | 20% |
| Unknown | 140 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 251 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 5% |
| Psychology | 14 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 41 | 7% |
| Unknown | 172 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#730,444
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#37
of 5,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,217
of 172,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,998 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.