| Title |
A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Big Data, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40537-017-0089-0 |
| Authors |
Oscar Day, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 419 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 147 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 148 | 35% |
| Engineering | 49 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 164 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,065,660
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#93
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,054
of 323,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.