| Title |
Preparation and Characterization of Silica/Polyamide-imide Nanocomposite Thin Films
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discover Nano, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11671-010-9726-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaokun Ma, Nam-Hee Lee, Hyo-Jin Oh, Jong-Sun Hwang, Sun-Jae Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 27% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 20 | 33% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Energy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#227
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,170
of 104,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.