↓ Skip to main content

A Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
A Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants
Published in
ADS, November 2005
DOI 10.1155/asp.2005.3044
Authors

Waldo Nogueira, Andreas Büchner, Thomas Lenarz, Bernd Edler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Student > Master 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 37 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,546
of 26,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,413
of 78,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#28
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.