↓ Skip to main content

A novel experimental porcine model to assess the impact of differential pulmonary blood flow on ischemia–reperfusion injury after unilateral lung transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
A novel experimental porcine model to assess the impact of differential pulmonary blood flow on ischemia–reperfusion injury after unilateral lung transplantation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40635-021-00371-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Elisabeth Frick, Michaela Orlitová, Arno Vanstapel, Sofie Ordies, Sandra Claes, Dominique Schols, Tobias Heigl, Janne Kaes, Berta Saez-Gimenez, Robin Vos, Geert M. Verleden, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Stijn E. Verleden, Dirk E. Van Raemdonck, Arne P. Neyrinck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,681,684
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#376
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#433,230
of 505,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.