↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and microbiological profile of non-tuberculous mycobacterial endophthalmitis—experience in a tertiary eye care centre in Southern India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and microbiological profile of non-tuberculous mycobacterial endophthalmitis—experience in a tertiary eye care centre in Southern India
Published in
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12348-016-0096-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Remya Mareen Paulose, Joveeta Joseph, Raja Narayanan, Savitri Sharma

Abstract

Endophthalmitis caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is a rare condition seen after surgery and trauma. This study reports a retrospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series of 5 patients referred to L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, and diagnosed with culture-proven NTM endophthalmitis between January 2004 and April 2015. Data collected included demographic information, presenting features, microbiology investigation, treatment course, and final visual outcome. Of 5555 clinically diagnosed infective endophthalmitis patients, vitreous samples were culture positive for bacteria in 1541 (27.7 %). The isolates from five (0.32 %) patients were identified as NTM. The clinical settings included post-cataract surgery (n = 3), post-vitrectomy (n = 1), and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (n = 1). The species of NTM identified were Mycobacterium chelonae (n = 3), Mycobacterium manitobense (n = 1), and Mycobacterium fortuitum (n = 1). All isolates were sensitive to amikacin while three of the five isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. Initial treatment strategies included pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotic (vancomycin and amikacin) injection (n = 3), additional intraocular lens explant (n = 1), and silicone oil removal in the patient with post-vitreo-retinal surgery. Intravitreal steroid along with antibiotics were given in three patients. Final outcome was favourable (20/200) in one patient, two eyes had unfavourable outcome with multiple recurrences, one was advised evisceration, and one resulted in phthisis bulbi. This communication reports a series of five cases of NTM endophthalmitis. Poor outcome despite cultureguided therapy suggests virulent nature of the organisms and the need for better treatment strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#165
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,480
of 377,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.