↓ Skip to main content

Effect of hydroxyapatite on critical-sized defect

Overview of attention for article published in Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Effect of hydroxyapatite on critical-sized defect
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40902-016-0072-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryoe-Woon Kim, Ji-Hyoung Kim, Seong-Yong Moon

Abstract

Xenologous or synthetic graft materials are commonly used as an alternative for autografts for guided bone regeneration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of carbonate apatite on the critical-size bone defect of rat's calvarium. Thirty-six critical-size defects were created on 18 adult male Sprague-Dawley rat calvaria under general anesthesia. Calvarial bones were grinded with 8 mm in daimeter bilaterally and then filled with (1) no grafts (control, n = 10 defects), (2) bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Pharma Ag. Swiss, n = 11 defects), and (3) hydroxyapatite (Bongros®, Bio@ Inc., Seongnam, Korea, n = 15 defects). At 4 and 8 weeks after surgery, the rats were sacrificed and all samples were processed for histological and histomorphometric analysis. At 4 weeks after surgery, group 3 (42.90 ± 9.33 %) showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (30.50 ± 6.05 %) and group 2 (28.53 ± 8.62 %). At 8 weeks after surgery, group 1 (50.21 ± 6.23 %), group 2 (54.12 ± 10.54 %), and group 3 (50.92 ± 6.05 %) showed no significant difference in the new bone formation. Bongros®-HA was thought to be the available material for regenerating the new bone formation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Materials Science 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 38%