↓ Skip to main content

On Berinde’s method for comparing iterative processes

Overview of attention for article published in Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
On Berinde’s method for comparing iterative processes
Published in
Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13663-020-00685-x
Authors

Constantin Zălinescu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,391,288
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#1
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,825
of 505,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them