Title |
Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00815-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans Flaatten, Bertrand Guidet, Finn H. Andersen, Antonio Artigas, Maurizio Cecconi, Ariane Boumendil, Muhammed Elhadi, Jesper Fjølner, Michael Joannidis, Christian Jung, Susannah Leaver, Brian Marsh, Rui Moreno, Sandra Oeyen, Yuriy Nalapko, Joerg C. Schefold, Wojciech Szczeklik, Sten Walther, Ximena Watson, Tilemachos Zafeiridis, Dylan W. de Lange |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
Poland | 1 | 10% |
Peru | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Italy | 1 | 10% |
Germany | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 41 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,569,250
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#651
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,814
of 527,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.