| Title |
Transverse shrinkage variations within tree stems of Melia azedarach planted in northern Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10086-018-1756-2 |
| Authors |
Doan Van Duong, Junji Matsumura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,578,524
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#52
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,533
of 335,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them