↓ Skip to main content

Performance of the ROX index to predict intubation in immunocompromised patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula for acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Performance of the ROX index to predict intubation in immunocompromised patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula for acute respiratory failure
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00801-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginie Lemiale, Guillaume Dumas, Alexandre Demoule, Frederic Pène, Achille Kouatchet, Magali Bisbal, Saad Nseir, Laurent Argaud, Loay Kontar, Kada Klouche, Francois Barbier, Amelie Seguin, Guillaume Louis, Jean-Michel Constantin, Julien Mayaux, Florent Wallet, Vincent Peigne, Christophe Girault, Johanna Oziel, Martine Nyunga, Nicolas Terzi, Lila Bouadma, Alexandre Lautrette, Naike Bige, Jean-Herle Raphalen, Laurent Papazian, Fabrice Bruneel, Christine Lebert, Dominique Benoit, Anne-Pascale Meert, Samir Jaber, Djamel Mokart, Michael Darmon, Elie Azoulay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#731
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,872
of 526,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.