| Title |
Disconnected, fragmented, or united? a trans-disciplinary review of network science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Network Science, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41109-016-0010-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
César A. Hidalgo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 67% |
| Scientists | 25 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 170 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 27% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 30% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#584,324
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Applied Network Science
#9
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,820
of 373,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Network Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.